- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 22:10:42 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 22:10:44 UTC
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19463 --- Comment #13 from Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw@chromium.org> --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > What Anne said. You're usually the consistency guy =-). You don't find this > > to be inconsistent with existing APIs? > > > No. This is consistent with existing APIs. > You get empty Nodelist all the time from various functions > (I know, we're dealing attributes here), but not null. > > > Also, it would be inconsistent to have empty nodelist in case type > is childList, but null in other cases. I don't have any further defense for my position. I suppose it's stylistic. My $.02 is that null for the case of non-childlist is correct. I defer to Anne to make the call. FWIW, This doesn't strike me as "make-or-break" either way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2012 22:10:44 UTC