Monday, 31 December 2012
- [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters
- [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters
- [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers
- [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters
- [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters
- [Bug 19540] Firing WebStorage storage event
- [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters
- [Bug 15209] Provide authors with a way to handle running out of buffers, if that turns out to ever actually happen in practice
- [Bug 15209] Provide authors with a way to handle running out of buffers, if that turns out to ever actually happen in practice
- [Bug 15210] Consider dispatching an event when bufferedAmount drops to 0
- [Bug 20535] consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters
- [Bug 20535] New: consider removing indexed property setters, creators and deleters
Sunday, 30 December 2012
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 19540] Firing WebStorage storage event
- [Bug 19540] Firing WebStorage storage event
- [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers
- [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 19540] Firing WebStorage storage event
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 18289] Support 'column' here for consistency with window.onerror?
Saturday, 29 December 2012
- [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers
- [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers
Friday, 28 December 2012
- [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
- [Bug 20531] [Templates]: "in column group" insertion mode rules for </colgroup> need to consider template contents case
- [Bug 20531] [Templates]: "in column group" insertion mode rules for </colgroup> need to consider template contents case
- [Bug 20531] [Templates]: "in column group" insertion mode rules for </colgroup> need to consider template contents case
- [Bug 20531] [Templates]: "in column group" insertion mode rules for </colgroup> need to consider template contents case
- [Bug 20531] New: [Templates]: "in column group" insertion mode rules for </colgroup> need to consider template contents case
- [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20528] New: Definition of [[Prototype]] for the interface prototype object is confusing
- [Bug 20527] New: Comment about NamedPropertiesObject is incorrect
Wednesday, 26 December 2012
Monday, 24 December 2012
- [Bug 20499] innerHTML and outerHTML should probably have [TreatNullAs=EmptyString]
- [Bug 20499] New: innerHTML and outerHTML should probably have [TreatNullAs=EmptyString]
Saturday, 22 December 2012
- [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined
- [Bug 20487] [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined
- [Bug 20492] When adopting a node, shouldn't the base URL change happen after the Document change?
- [Bug 20494] Text should have the features of ChildNode
- [Bug 20494] Text should have the features of ChildNode
- [Bug 20494] New: Text should have the features of ChildNode
- [Bug 20489] [Custom]: Nothing ever defines what the "custom element name" of a random element is
- [Bug 20489] [Custom]: Nothing ever defines what the "custom element name" of a random element is
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20493] New: [Custom]: Custom constructor setup in the spec is wrong
- [Bug 20492] New: When adopting a node, shouldn't the base URL change happen after the Document change?
- [Bug 20491] New: [Custom]: Need to actually define the upgrade algorithm so it's interoperably implementable
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20490] New: [Custom]: Things that mutate the DOM tree should queue observer records
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20489] [Custom]: Nothing ever defines what the "custom element name" of a random element is
- [Bug 20489] New: [Custom]: Nothing ever defines what the "custom element name" of a random element is
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20488] New: [Custom]: Need to define what happens when nodes are adopted into or out of documents that have custom element definitions
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20487] New: [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via createElement is underdefined
Friday, 21 December 2012
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20486] New: [Custom]: Prototype don't inherit from interfaces
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20485] New: [Custom]: Creation of custom elements via constructor function is underdefined
- [Bug 20483] [Templates]: Specify the behavior of XDM when encountering <template> element
- [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
- [Bug 20483] New: [Templates]: Specify the behavior of XDM when encountering <template> element
- [Bug 20482] New: [Custom]: specify default <element extends>
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20481] New: Grammar Fixes needed: Dominique's feedback + Microsoft's feedback
- [Bug 20480] New: Say something about keys
- [Bug 20478] New: Grammar allows "static;" as a valid operation
- [Bug 20477] New: serializer grammar doesn't expose "attribute" as a valid value
- [Bug 14569] URL object should not return DOMTokenList
- [Bug 17772] [URL] The definition of "absolute url" makes https:foo not an absolute url, since its behavior depends on whether the base is https: or not. Is that desired? In particular, using this definition for websockets means that wss: urls with no forward...
- [Bug 19114] (editorial) ""gopher" missing quote
- [Bug 20475] New: Grammar allows "- Infinity", but not "- 1"
- [Bug 20361] Grammar is wrong for serializers
- [Bug 20468] [Custom]: specify link rel="components"
- [Bug 20466] [Accessibility]: Custom element should allow declaration of default accessibility features, such as role and other ARIA attributes.
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20468] New: [Custom]: specify link rel="components"
Thursday, 20 December 2012
- [Bug 14949] [Meta]: Component Model needs an Explainer document
- [Bug 20466] New: [Accessibility]: Custom element should allow declaration of default accessibility features, such as role and other ARIA attributes.
- [Bug 20390] The origin of documents not in a browsing context is wrong in the spec
- [Bug 20390] The origin of documents not in a browsing context is wrong in the spec
- [Bug 20458] New: 4.2.22: converting IDL value to IDL type?
- [Bug 20456] New: 4.2.24.1: wrong conversion
- [Bug 20455] New: converting to an ECMAScript value [of a specified type??]
- [Bug 20453] New: 3.1: two questions re underscore removal
- [Bug 20452] New: 4.2.16: extraneous "the"
Wednesday, 19 December 2012
- [Bug 20445] TreeWalker: Specified workflow stuck at root node
- [Bug 20445] TreeWalker: Specified workflow stuck at root node
- [Bug 20445] TreeWalker: Specified workflow stuck at root node
- [Bug 20390] The origin of documents not in a browsing context is wrong in the spec
- [Bug 20390] The origin of documents not in a browsing context is wrong in the spec
- [Bug 20390] The origin of documents not in a browsing context is wrong in the spec
- [Bug 20390] The origin of documents not in a browsing context is wrong in the spec
- [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers
- [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers
- [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers
- [Bug 20390] The origin of documents not in a browsing context is wrong in the spec
- [Bug 20445] TreeWalker: Specified workflow stuck at root node
- [Bug 20445] New: TreeWalker: Specified workflow stuck at root node
- [Bug 20444] New: 4.*: "descriptor { ... }"
- [Bug 19540] Firing WebStorage storage event
- [Bug 20443] New: 4.4.6: "is not of the enumeration’s values"
- [Bug 20442] New: 4.2.24: <ul> should be <ol>
- [Bug 20441] New: algorithms not marked as such
- [Bug 20440] New: 4.4.1.1: "of it type list"
- [Bug 20439] New: 4.4.6: <span class="desc">
- [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers
- [Bug 20438] [Custom]: consider adding "inserted" and "removed" lifecycle methods
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20438] New: [Custom]: consider adding "inserted" and "removed" lifecycle methods
Tuesday, 18 December 2012
- [Bug 19540] Firing WebStorage storage event
- [Bug 19540] Firing WebStorage storage event
- [Bug 20130] [Templates]: <template> within <template> effectively resets the implied context
- [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers
- [Bug 20390] The origin of documents not in a browsing context is wrong in the spec
- [Bug 20422] New: 4.2.21: "then then"
- [Bug 20419] New: 4.2.24.2: missing "then"?
- [Bug 15695] Should MutationCallback be a callback *interface*?
- [Bug 15695] Should MutationCallback be a callback *interface*?
Monday, 17 December 2012
- [Bug 17871] Element attributes should not be required to be stored in an ordered list
- [Bug 17871] Element attributes should not be required to be stored in an ordered list
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20029] Add a short introduction to "Range modification under document mutation"
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20397] [Custom]: Consider changing elementupgrade to a mutation observer
Sunday, 16 December 2012
- [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers
- [Bug 20407] allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 20407] New: allow attributes to have different types for their getter and setter
- [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers
- [Bug 18863] [Custom]: Consider only restricting naming to contain a dash
- [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
- [Bug 18669] Switch from is= to <tag if a decision has been reached among implementers
Saturday, 15 December 2012
- [Bug 17871] Element attributes should not be required to be stored in an ordered list
- [Bug 17871] Element attributes should not be required to be stored in an ordered list
Friday, 14 December 2012
- [Bug 20397] [Custom]: Consider changing elementupgrade to a mutation observer
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20296] [Shadow]: Attributes should not have dashes
- [Bug 20397] [Custom]: Consider changing elementupgrade to a mutation observer
- [Bug 20397] [Custom]: Consider changing elementupgrade to a mutation observer
- [Bug 20397] [Custom]: Consider changing elementupgrade to a mutation observer
- [Bug 20397] [Custom]: Consider changing elementupgrade to a mutation observer
- [Bug 20397] [Custom]: Consider changing elementupgrade to a mutation observer
- [Bug 20397] [Custom]: Consider changing elementupgrade to a mutation observer
- [Bug 20397] [Custom]: Consider changing elementupgrade to a mutation observer
- [Bug 20397] [Custom]: Consider changing elementupgrade to a mutation observer
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20397] New: [Custom]: Consider changing elementupgrade to a mutation observer
- [Bug 17871] Element attributes should not be required to be stored in an ordered list
- [Bug 18863] [Custom]: Consider only restricting naming to contain a dash
- [Bug 20394] [IndexedDB] Spec should use WebIDL concepts such as sequence<T> rather than Array
- [Bug 20394] [IndexedDB] Spec should use WebIDL concepts such as sequence<T> rather than Array
- [Bug 20394] [IndexedDB] Spec should use WebIDL concepts such as sequence<T> rather than Array
- [Bug 20394] New: [IndexedDB] Spec should use WebIDL concepts such as sequence<T> rather than Array
- [Bug 16487] EventTarget constructor
- [Bug 18780] Provide a hook for seamless event retargetting
- [Bug 19431] Namespace of elements made via .createElement() in XML documents must be null
- [Bug 17871] Element attributes should not be required to be stored in an ordered list
- [Bug 16571] Define order for named properties
- [Bug 16487] EventTarget constructor
- [Bug 17871] Element attributes should not be required to be stored in an ordered list
- [Bug 16487] EventTarget constructor
- [Bug 20378] Need to define base URI for the document created via DOMParser
- [Bug 16571] Define order for named properties
- [Bug 17871] Element attributes should not be required to be stored in an ordered list
- [Bug 20378] Need to define base URI for the document created via DOMParser
- [Bug 17871] Element attributes should not be required to be stored in an ordered list
- [Bug 20378] Need to define base URI for the document created via DOMParser
- [Bug 16571] Define order for named properties
- [Bug 16571] Define order for named properties
- [Bug 17648] [Awaiting ES6] Add iterators
- [Bug 17648] [Awaiting ES6] Add iterators
- [Bug 20354] [Shadow]: HOST_RULE should be less than 32.
Thursday, 13 December 2012
- [Bug 20378] New: Need to define base URI for the document created via DOMParser
- [Bug 16571] Define order for named properties
- [Bug 16571] Define order for named properties
- [Bug 17871] Element attributes should not be required to be stored in an ordered list
- [Bug 16487] EventTarget constructor
- [Bug 16487] EventTarget constructor
- [Bug 16487] EventTarget constructor
- [Bug 17648] [Awaiting ES6] Add iterators
- [Bug 16571] Define order for named properties
- [Bug 17871] Element attributes should not be required to be stored in an ordered list
- [Bug 20320] [Shadow]: Unclear how HTML form submission should work
- [Bug 17871] Element attributes should not be required to be stored in an ordered list
- [Bug 20354] [Shadow]: HOST_RULE should be less than 32.
- [Bug 20354] [Shadow]: HOST_RULE should be less than 32.
- [Bug 20354] [Shadow]: HOST_RULE should be less than 32.
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20354] [Shadow]: HOST_RULE should be less than 32.
Wednesday, 12 December 2012
- [Bug 18747] [Custom]: Specify invoking "created" callback
- [Bug 18747] [Custom]: Specify invoking "created" callback
- [Bug 20361] Grammar is wrong for serializers
- [Bug 20361] New: Grammar is wrong for serializers
- [Bug 20354] [Shadow]: HOST_RULE should be less than 32.
- [Bug 20357] [Shadow]: Wrong argument names of ShadowRoot object methods
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20357] New: [Shadow]: Wrong argument names of ShadowRoot object methods
- [Bug 20354] [Shadow]: HOST_RULE should be less than 32.
- [Bug 20355] New: [Shadow]: No way to obtain list of Shadow Roots
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20354] New: [Shadow]: HOST_RULE should be less than 32.
- [Bug 17113] [Custom]: What happens when you remove or change contents of <element>?
Tuesday, 11 December 2012
- [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
- [Bug 19790] [Custom]: Consider bulk register algorithm
- [Bug 18863] [Custom]: Consider only restricting naming to contain a dash
- [Bug 18863] [Custom]: Consider only restricting naming to contain a dash
- [Bug 20299] [Custom]: Extensions to the document interface are not valid WebIDL
- [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
- [Bug 20346] New: [Custom]: "prototype" as an identifier in the ElementRegistrationOptions is invalid according to WebIDL
- [Bug 20299] [Custom]: Extensions to the document interface are not valid WebIDL
- [Bug 20299] [Custom]: Extensions to the document interface are not valid WebIDL
- [Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
- [Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
- [Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
- [Bug 18909] "File a bug" link
- [Bug 19936] consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value
- [Bug 19936] consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value
- [Bug 18909] "File a bug" link
- [Bug 18720] [Custom]: Specify imperative syntax for custom DOM elements
- [Bug 17313] [Custom]: Provide an example of how to create an element prototype
- [Bug 18846] Editorial - 4.2.20 Should 'D' be 'dictionary'?
- [Bug 18863] [Custom]: Consider only restricting naming to contain a dash
- [Bug 18863] [Custom]: Consider only restricting naming to contain a dash
Monday, 10 December 2012
- [Bug 18720] [Custom]: Specify imperative syntax for custom DOM elements
- [Bug 18595] [Custom]: Enumerate effects of hooking into parser
- [Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
- [Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
- [Bug 18878] [[NativeBrand]] of "Function" doesn't seem to exist in current ES6 drafts
- [Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
- [Bug 18863] [Custom]: Consider only restricting naming to contain a dash
- [Bug 18863] [Custom]: Consider only restricting naming to contain a dash
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20332] New: [Custom]: Rename "custom DOM elements" to "custom elements"
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20331] New: [Custom]: Rename "shadow DOM subtree" to "shadow tree"
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20330] New: [Custom]: Remove the "Terminology" section
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
- [Bug 20299] [Custom]: Extensions to the document interface are not valid WebIDL
- [Bug 20329] New: [Custom]: Specify more callback-ey type for document.register return type
- [Bug 20299] [Custom]: Extensions to the document interface are not valid WebIDL
- [Bug 20242] dictionary LifecycleCallbacks should be callback interface or Function
- [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
- [Bug 20299] [Custom]: Extensions to the document interface are not valid WebIDL
- [Bug 20242] dictionary LifecycleCallbacks should be callback interface or Function
- [Bug 20299] [Custom]: Extensions to the document interface are not valid WebIDL
- [Bug 18863] [Custom]: Consider only restricting naming to contain a dash
- [Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
- [Bug 20299] [Custom]: Extensions to the document interface are not valid WebIDL
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
- [Bug 20189] [Custom]: Provide an event that signals when all custom elements in static source are ready/upgraded
- [Bug 18534] [Custom]: Pseudo-class to mitigate FOUC
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20186] [Custom]: Add a CSS pseudo to distinguish between upgraded, custom elements
- [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 19790] [Custom]: Consider bulk register algorithm
- [Bug 19789] [Custom]: Consider ditching HTMLSpanElement as assumed base element
- [Bug 17103] [Custom]: Write first draft of the Custom DOM elements spec
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 17649] Address WebIDL comments from Kyle Huey
- [Bug 18558] [IndexedDB] Define error seen when key generator maximum value is reached
- [Bug 20322] New: Document the force preflight flag
- [Bug 20149] [Shadow]: Specify the order of stylesheets in different tree scopes for apply-author-styles.
- [Bug 20150] [Shadow]: "Nested tree" is defined, but "nesting tree" is only implied
- [Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
- [Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
- [Bug 20150] [Shadow]: "Nested tree" is defined, but "nesting tree" is only implied
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20150] [Shadow]: "Nested tree" is defined, but "nesting tree" is only implied
- [Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
- [Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
- [Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
- [Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
- [Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
- [Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
- [Bug 17749] [WebIDL] Nit: "unrestricted double type" defined as 32-bit
- [Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
- [Bug 17719] Consider throwing when attribute setter is called without an argument.
- [Bug 18424] Cannot parse static operation with ReturnType (WebIDL editors draft 10 July 2012)
- [Bug 18421] Cycle language about dictionaries needs s/interface/dictionary/
- [Bug 18420] Cycles via dictionary members should probably be prohibited
- [Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20320] New: [Shadow]: Unclear how HTML form submission should work
- [Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
- [Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
- [Bug 18023] Typo DOMString
- [Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
- [Bug 20299] [Custom]: Extensions to the document interface are not valid WebIDL
- [Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
Saturday, 8 December 2012
- [Bug 18878] [[NativeBrand]] of "Function" doesn't seem to exist in current ES6 drafts
- [Bug 16733] Drop 'endings'?
- [Bug 20304] New: [Shadow]: pseudo attribute
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20303] New: [Shadow]: ShadowAware
- [Bug 20017] [Shadow]: Retargeting relatedTarget algorithm prevents events from be fired if a user creates a MouseEvent manually with a relatedTarget which is same to the target.
- [Bug 14968] [Meta]: Specify how custom elements work
- [Bug 20299] New: [Custom]: Extensions to the document interface are not valid WebIDL
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20296] New: [Shadow]: Attributes should not have dashes
- [Bug 20017] [Shadow]: Retargeting relatedTarget algorithm prevents events from be fired if a user creates a MouseEvent manually with a relatedTarget which is same to the target.
- [Bug 20017] [Shadow]: Retargeting relatedTarget algorithm prevents events from be fired if a user creates a MouseEvent manually with a relatedTarget which is same to the target.
Friday, 7 December 2012
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20247] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events
- [Bug 20248] [Shadow]: Consider stopping "input" event at boundary
- [Bug 20247] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
- [Bug 19400] [Shadow]: Specify insertion points in terms of "display:contents"
- [Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 19891] [Shadow]: Specify how custom pseudo elements are serialized/deserialized
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
- [Bug 19684] [Shadow]: shadow reference combinator should be css function.
- [Bug 20295] [Shadow]: Make all Method/Attribute descriptions consistent
- [Bug 20295] New: [Shadow]: Make all Method/Attribute descriptions consistents
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20139] [Shadow]: Scoping constraints should be informative
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 19918] [Shadow]: Additional statement for spec about upper boundary encapsulation
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20006] [Shadow] Needs to define CSSHostRule
- [Bug 18878] [[NativeBrand]] of "Function" doesn't seem to exist in current ES6 drafts
- [Bug 14214] missing definition of Transferable
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20149] [Shadow]: Specify the order of stylesheets in different tree scopes for apply-author-styles.
- [Bug 14949] [Meta]: Component Model needs an Explainer document
- [Bug 20294] New: [Explainer]: Misleading claim around CSS resets
- [Bug 20149] [Shadow]: Specify the order of stylesheets in different tree scopes for apply-author-styles.
- [Bug 20282] [Shadow]: The old-style getElement* accessors are old and should be gone
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20150] [Shadow]: "Nested tree" is defined, but "nesting tree" is only implied
- [Bug 20150] [Shadow]: "Nested tree" is defined, but "nesting tree" is only implied
- [Bug 19684] [Shadow]: shadow reference combinator should be css function.
- [Bug 14973] [Meta]: Specify how decorators work
- [Bug 15058] Specify what happens when decorators infinitely loop
- [Bug 20243] [Shadow]: Strengthen boundary between shadow host's document elements and shadow tree nodes
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 19684] [Shadow]: shadow reference combinator should be css function.
- [Bug 19684] [Shadow]: shadow reference combinator should be css function.
- [Bug 20247] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events
- [Bug 15200] HTMLCollection string methods should return multiple matches
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20105] Nothing in the spec really defines how changes to token lists change the underlying string
- [Bug 20282] [Shadow]: The old-style getElement* accessors are old and should be gone
- [Bug 20247] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events
- [Bug 19101] consider allowing nested enum definitions
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 19778] Wrong regex for integer
- [Bug 17508] Let enum lists end with a comma
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20282] New: [Shadow]: The old-style getElement* accessors are old and should be gone
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 15950] Rename no-quirks mode and limited quirks mode
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20260] [Shadow]: ShadowRoot should have shadowRoot attribute to get older shadow tree.
- [Bug 18547] Add [ImplicitThis] to EventTarget?
- [Bug 18547] Add [ImplicitThis] to EventTarget?
- [Bug 18547] Add [ImplicitThis] to EventTarget?
Thursday, 6 December 2012
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20232] [Shadow]: navigation order for elements distributed into insertion points
- [Bug 20247] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20249] [Shadow]: Determine if MouseEvent.offsetX/offsetY need to be adjusted when retargeting
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20279] [Shadow]: Reprojection step needs moar clarity
- [Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
- [Bug 20260] [Shadow]: ShadowRoot should have shadowRoot attribute to get older shadow tree.
- [Bug 20260] [Shadow]: ShadowRoot should have shadowRoot attribute to get older shadow tree.
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20268] [Shadow]: HTMLShadowElement.olderShadowRoot might return a wrong value unintentionally.
- [Bug 19684] [Shadow]: shadow reference combinator should be css function.
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20276] [Shadow]: Confusion in tree composition algorithm
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20278] [Shadow]: Typo and grammar error
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20143] [Shadow]: When you click on dfn, it should show a link to it
- [Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
- [Bug 15480] [Shadow]: Things to Consider in the Future
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20144] [Shadow]: Consider adding "private" flag to createShadowRoot
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20279] [Shadow]: Reprojection step needs moar clarity
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20278] [Shadow]: Typo and grammar error
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20232] [Shadow]: navigation order for elements distributed into insertion points
- [Bug 20150] [Shadow]: Contradiction in @host @-rule matching criteria
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20149] [Shadow]: Specify the order of stylesheets in different tree scopes for apply-author-styles.
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20276] [Shadow]: Confusion in tree composition algorithm
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20268] [Shadow]: HTMLShadowElement.olderShadowRoot might return a wrong value unintentionally.
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20260] [Shadow]: ShadowRoot should have shadowRoot attribute to get older shadow tree.
- [Bug 20249] [Shadow]: Determine if MouseEvent.offsetX/offsetY need to be adjusted when retargeting
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20248] [Shadow]: Consider stopping "input" event at boundary
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20247] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20279] New: [Shadow]: Reprojection step needs moar clarity
- [Bug 20278] New: [Shadow]: Typo and grammar error
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20276] New: [Shadow]: Confusion in tree composition algorithm
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20268] New: [Shadow]: HTMLShadowElement.olderShadowRoot might return a wrong value unintentionally.
- [Bug 19110] DOM "throw" algorithm doesn't seem to use WebIDL "throw" algorithm correctly
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20260] New: [Shadow]: ShadowRoot should have shadowRoot attribute to get older shadow tree.
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 19110] DOM "throw" algorithm doesn't seem to use WebIDL "throw" algorithm correctly
Wednesday, 5 December 2012
- [Bug 20257] IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value
- [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
- [Bug 16277] [Templates]: Specify what happens on template.cloneNode
- [Bug 20257] New: IDBCursor should walk on secondary ordering of index value
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20247] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events
- [Bug 20246] Provide a system to observe nodes entering and leaving the viewport
- [Bug 20246] Provide a system to observe nodes entering and leaving the viewport
- [Bug 20246] Provide a system to observe nodes entering and leaving the viewport
- [Bug 20249] New: [Shadow]: Determine if MouseEvent.offsetX/offsetY need to be adjusted when retargeting
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20248] New: [Shadow]: Consider stopping "input" event at boundary
- [Bug 20247] [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 20247] New: [Shadow]: Update constraints around stopping events
- [Bug 20246] Provide a system to observe nodes entering and leaving the viewport
- [Bug 20246] New: Provide a system to observe nodes entering and leaving the viewport
- [Bug 16277] [Templates]: Specify what happens on template.cloneNode
- [Bug 20243] New: Strengthen boundary between shadow host's document elements and shadow tree nodes
- [Bug 15476] [Templates]: Specify how templates work
- [Bug 16277] [Templates]: Specify what happens on template.cloneNode
- [Bug 20130] [Templates]: <template> within <template> effectively resets the implied context
- [Bug 20242] New: dictionary LifecycleCallbacks should be callback interface or Function
Tuesday, 4 December 2012
- [Bug 18780] Provide a hook for seamless event retargetting
- [Bug 18780] Provide a hook for seamless event retargetting
- [Bug 18780] Provide a hook for seamless event retargetting
- [Bug 18780] Provide a hook for seamless event retargetting
- [Bug 20105] Nothing in the spec really defines how changes to token lists change the underlying string
- [Bug 20105] Nothing in the spec really defines how changes to token lists change the underlying string
- [Bug 20104] Algorithm for DOMTokenList.add seems wrong if tokens are present multiple times in the list
- [Bug 14591] Get rid of Range.detach()
- [Bug 20232] New: [Shadow]: navigation order for elements distributed into insertion points
- [Bug 14978] [Meta]: Specify how shadow DOM works
- [Bug 19897] [Shadow]: Add Custom Pseudo-Elements example
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 16070] uses MessageEvent but doesn't define or reference external definition
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 16604] RFE: add unsigned byte as synonym for octet
- [Bug 16537] Interface types - Implements is ambiguous
- [Bug 20008] allow [Unforgeable] on an interface
- [Bug 19936] consider allowing non-matching enums to be converted to a particular value
- [Bug 16491] Add simpler and better event registration system
- [Bug 20029] Add a short introduction to "Range modification under document mutation"
- [Bug 17046] Implement redirect audit functionality for XHR
- [Bug 15418] sort out HTTP auth
- [Bug 19778] Wrong regex for integer
- [Bug 18547] Add [ImplicitThis] to EventTarget?
- [Bug 19470] Event firing sequence on abort() after send()
- [Bug 16070] uses MessageEvent but doesn't define or reference external definition
- [Bug 17719] Consider throwing when attribute setter is called without an argument.
- [Bug 20020] Support subclassing Array
- [Bug 17749] [WebIDL] Nit: "unrestricted double type" defined as 32-bit
- [Bug 18023] Typo DOMString
- [Bug 16000] Trailers
- [Bug 17426] Consider adding a replaceContents() method
- [Bug 17648] [Awaiting ES6] Add iterators
- [Bug 19007] Consider adding a swap() method
- [Bug 18352] Note about Object.prototype.toString is unclear
- [Bug 19831] Investigate overrideMimeType()
- [Bug 18421] Cycle language about dictionaries needs s/interface/dictionary/
- [Bug 14141] Introduce a constructor for Range
- [Bug 18420] Cycles via dictionary members should probably be prohibited
- [Bug 20105] Nothing in the spec really defines how changes to token lists change the underlying string
- [Bug 12607] Let authors control redirect behavior
- [Bug 16455] Using platform object example
- [Bug 19571] .length should count optional arguments
- [Bug 20159] Introduce attributes for DOMString coercion
- [Bug 15417] Redirects and the base URL
- [Bug 16767] Allow user objects for Array[] types
- [Bug 20158] Unrestricted typed dictionary
- [Bug 16489] Retrieve element language
- [Bug 16502] Define multiple monitor support and per-subdomain
- [Bug 13971] Define a renameNode method
- [Bug 18909] "File a bug" link
- [Bug 16487] EventTarget constructor
- [Bug 18846] Editorial - 4.2.20 Should 'D' be 'dictionary'?
- [Bug 19110] DOM "throw" algorithm doesn't seem to use WebIDL "throw" algorithm correctly
- [Bug 16833] consider always exposing a "length" property for objects with indexed properties
- [Bug 18362] Make stringifiers not take into account expandos
- [Bug 15200] HTMLCollection string methods should return multiple matches
- [Bug 20038] Upgrade FormData
- [Bug 19101] consider allowing nested enum definitions
- [Bug 18878] [[NativeBrand]] of "Function" doesn't seem to exist in current ES6 drafts
- [Bug 17541] Carefully think through how Range.insertNode should behave when the node to be inserted is already at the beginning of the range
- [Bug 18908] Consider disallowing expandos on objects with a named getter but no named setter
- [Bug 16312] use of undocumented 'switch' convention for rule formulation is ambiguous
- [Bug 17713] Exceptions thrown from event handlers should not be propagated
- [Bug 20019] Support subclassing ES6 Map
- [Bug 12837] Define unloading document cleanup steps
- [Bug 19988] add a [LenientFloat] to mean "ignore IDL attribute assignment or method call if a non-finite float is passed"
- [Bug 16571] Define order for named properties
- [Bug 18540] Proposal for a new acceptNode() return value for TreeWalker.
- [Bug 20045] data: URLs, HTTP, and parsing
- [Bug 19962] Add insertAdjacentText and insertAdjacentElement?
- [Bug 16488] Consider adding parent() / ancestor() method
- [Bug 10734] Create LR Grammar
- [Bug 14214] missing definition of Transferable
- [Bug 20104] Algorithm for DOMTokenList.add seems wrong if tokens are present multiple times in the list
- [Bug 18424] Cannot parse static operation with ReturnType (WebIDL editors draft 10 July 2012)
- [Bug 20225] don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 20225] New: don't allow overridden operations and attribute getters/setters to be invoked on descendant objects
- [Bug 17761] Consider a src/href-like attribute for easy integration?
- [Bug 17761] Consider a src/href-like attribute for easy integration?
Monday, 3 December 2012
- [Bug 20189] [Custom]: Provide an event that signals when all custom elements in static source are ready/upgraded
- [Bug 20186] [Custom]: Add a CSS pseudo to distinguish between upgraded, custom elements
- [Bug 20189] [Custom]: Provide an event that signals when all custom elements in static source are ready/upgraded
- [Bug 20186] [Custom]: Add a CSS pseudo to distinguish between upgraded, custom elements
- [Bug 20186] [Custom]: Add a CSS pseudo to distinguish between upgraded, custom elements
- [Bug 20131] [MutationObservers] Unclear whether unique record instances are required in 5.3.2 "Queuing a mutation record"
- [Bug 19897] [Shadow]: Add Custom Pseudo-Elements example
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20142] [Shadow]: dfn style should be bold
- [Bug 19897] [Shadow]: Add Custom Pseudo-Elements example
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 18428] [Shadow]: Next Working Draft Iteration
- [Bug 20140] [Shadow]: The sentence is awkward and possibly unnecessary
- [Bug 18547] Add [ImplicitThis] to EventTarget?
- [Bug 18547] Add [ImplicitThis] to EventTarget?
- [Bug 20131] [MutationObservers] Unclear whether unique record instances are required in 5.3.2 "Queuing a mutation record"