- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 23:58:17 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20247 --- Comment #6 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> --- >From a thread on whatwg: http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2012-December/038283.html >It sounds though like you'd want a different approach to this. What if >I have a <video> as my implementation detail? Then you probably don't want the "load" events of <video> escaping out of the shadow tree, just as the spec provides. It's an interesting question, though. Along with "load", such implementation detail may dispatch a whole bunch of other events (http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-video-element.html#mediaevents). Most of these events--at least, following my reasoning--seem like they should just be kept in the shadow tree. I wonder if we would be better off reversing the condition and stopping ALL events, except a set of events whose meaning stays clear after retargeting (like "click"). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 7 December 2012 23:58:20 UTC