[Bug 20299] [Custom]: Extensions to the document interface are not valid WebIDL from bugzilla@jessica.w3.org on 2012-12-10 (public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org from December 2012)

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:17:26 +0000
To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-20299-2532-vpmaN4wdIP@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20299

Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > Did I get them all? :)
> 
> Looks like it, yes.  I wouldn't worry too much about the exact type of
> ElementConstructor for the moment, while WebIDL gets sorted out around there.

Cool! Filed bug 20329 so I don't forget.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 10 December 2012 22:17:30 UTC