- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:10:22 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20394 --- Comment #2 from Joshua Bell <jsbell@chromium.org> --- (In reply to comment #1) > For what it's worht, the current key setup just makes no sense at all in > WebIDL terms. When I looked into implementing it in a WebIDL binding for > Firefox I had to just give up because it's completely nonsense. See > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012OctDec/0087.html > (which was met with deafening silence). I must have missed that, but +1. To maintain the intent behind IDB (and compatibility with shipping implementations) it probably turns into a bunch of additions to WebIDL. Not a bad thing, but will require spec coordination. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 14 December 2012 19:10:25 UTC