- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:27:06 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20397 --- Comment #8 from Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> --- (In reply to comment #7) > Oh, that sounds like a bug. My thinking here was to keep element upgrade as quiet and least side-effectey as possible, and only signal when the upgrade is done. Also, in cases when we (the browser) know that the author doesn't hold JS references to the element that's being replaced, we (the browser) don't _need_ to do actually do any replacing. In which case, we don't have to generate artificial mutation records. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 14 December 2012 23:27:12 UTC