- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 00:05:41 +0000
- To: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18863 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Buchner <danieljb2@gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #5) > My $0.02 > > > 2. Do we really want to end up with this: <-sometag> or <sometag->, if not, > > are we going to institute another restriction that the tag cannot begin or > > end with a dash? > > I'm of the mind that we don't need to worry about this. If some developer > does this they will either have a good reason or they will be ridiculed. > > > 3. Is namespacing for tag names really as much a concern as JS variables? I > > would argue that it isn't, because 99% of the time you know what tags are > > included in your app. > > Does this not conflict with your argument #1? > > In any case, I'm not sure what you mean. If YUI provides "x-button" and > JQuery provides "x-button", there goes the lovely interoperation we seek. > Almost certainly it will become standard to prefix your tags. Then we have > alphabet soup. > > > 4. is it really providing a significant value? > > I know you need more opinions than just mine, but I still say yes. > > S One last, real concern: are we 100% sure we'll never have an HTML element native to the spec that has dashes in it? If there was ever a natively-dashed tag name, would this create a problem? All in all, I'm not passionate about it - it's just another nit in the way of landing the patch in Firefox and a odd way of inferring that an element has super powers. I'm punting to Dimitri :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 00:05:47 UTC