Thursday, 27 June 2013
Wednesday, 26 June 2013
- [sysreq #7104] Re: Please make w3process Tracker instance report all new Actions and Issues to the list
- Please make w3process Tracker instance report all new Actions and Issues to the list
Monday, 17 June 2013
- Re: Priorities
- Re: Priorities
- Priorities
- Re: A possible solution to defining "widely reviewed"
- Re: A possible solution to defining "widely reviewed"
- Re: A possible solution to defining "widely reviewed"
- Re: A possible solution to defining "widely reviewed"
Sunday, 16 June 2013
Friday, 14 June 2013
Thursday, 13 June 2013
- Re: A possible solution to defining "widely reviewed"
- Re: A possible solution to defining "widely reviewed"
- A possible solution to defining "widely reviewed"
Monday, 10 June 2013
- forking specifications; normative references to "latest versions"; public specs that enable proprietary extensions
- Towards getting agreement on the High Priority TR Issues [Was: Re: ISSUE-10 Raising awareness before CR]
- W3C Process: Tracking Issues, Bugs and Actions [via Revising W3C Process Community Group]
- Re: ISSUE-10 Raising awareness before CR
- Re: ISSUE-10 Raising awareness before CR
- ISSUE-10 Raising awareness before CR
- Re: tracker - please use it Re: List of issues on Chapter 7.
- Cross-posting: Please don't. Re: List of issues on Chapter 7.
- tracker - please use it Re: List of issues on Chapter 7.
Sunday, 9 June 2013
Thursday, 6 June 2013
- Using this Mailing list Re: Plea for Mail list etiquette agreement for w3process list [Was: other stuff ...]
- Re: A proposal for a new Recommendation Track [via Revising W3C Process Community Group]
- Re: Coming back in
- Re: A proposal for a new Recommendation Track [via Revising W3C Process Community Group]
Wednesday, 5 June 2013
- Plea for Mail list etiquette agreement for w3process list [Was: other stuff ...]
- Re: What to slash Re: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what?
- Coming back in
- Re: A proposal for a new Recommendation Track [via Revising W3C Process Community Group]
- A proposal for a new Recommendation Track [via Revising W3C Process Community Group]
- RE: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what?
Tuesday, 4 June 2013
- Re: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what?
- RE: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what?
- Re: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what?
- Re: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what?
- Re: Proc Doc: time to Slash and Burn, Divide and Conquer, or what?