- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:45:55 -0400
- To: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
- CC: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
On 6/4/13 7:38 AM, ext Stephen Zilles wrote: > > Charles and Art have said, > > > > > > Whose consensus? > > > > > > I think the answer here is "The members" - i.e. the Advisory Committee. > > > > > >> * 7. Tech Reports process. > > Re "consensus by whom?" - if the TR process is going to change, there > > should be some type of CfC/RfC of the Draft that is open to the Public > > (which includes Members). Similar to a LCWD review for a spec. > > I would note that this is the process which has been followed for all > versions of the W3C Process. I has been presented to the AC for > comment and then given a formal AC Review. What is new, is conducting > the discussion in which changes are prepared in public. The minutes of > all the recent discussions have long been Member visible and are > summarized in the regular AB Summaries, but that has not been public > (in part because the AB discusses topics that might not be ready for > public presentation). The W3C Process is not, however, such a topic. > So you agree that all W3C _process_ related discussions should be moved from Member-confidential list(s) and meetings and conducted solely in Public list(s) and meetings? -AB
Received on Tuesday, 4 June 2013 11:46:27 UTC