[ALL] agenda 25 Sep telecon - 1500 UTC

Agenda - Sep 25 2007 SWD telecon - 1500 UTC 
W3C Semantic Web Deployment Working Group 
  http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/ 
  Tuesday, 1500 UTC 
    0800 Seattle 
    1100 Boston 
    1600 London 
    1700 Amsterdam 
  Phone 
    Boston: +1-617-761-6200 
    Nice: +33-4-8906-3499 
    Bristol: +44-117-370-6152 
  Conference code 79394# ('SWDWG') 
  IRC irc://irc.w3.org:6665/swd Web-based IRC (member-only) 

Chair: Tom Baker/Guus Schreiber 
Scribe: Quentin, Ed on deck 
    (see http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/ScribeDuty) 
Regrets: Al (Sep 25), Diego (Sep 25, Oct 2) 

Attendance of SWD WG telecons is restricted to registered WG
participants and persons invited by the chairs. 

====================================================================== 

1. ADMIN (10 min) ---------------------------------------

Minutes PROPOSED to accept minutes of 18 Sep telecon: 
http://www.w3.org/2007/09/18-swd-minutes.html 

Upcoming telecons next telecons: 
  2 Oct - then face-to-face on 8-9 Oct (also a telecon!)

Face-to-face meeting - Amsterdam - October 8-9 2007 
  -- Logistics http://www.few.vu.nl/~aisaac/swd/ 
  -- Draft agenda http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/AmsterdamAgenda
  -- Registration
  http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/39408/swd-ftf-adam-registration/
  ACTION: all to register (indicate also that you're not planning to
  attend and/or want to attend via telecon) 

Roll call for attendance as of 2007-09-21:
  WG members: Tom, Guus, Diego, Ed, Justin, Antoine, Jon, Alistair, Ralph, Sean
  Guests: Steven Pemberton (RDFa), Mark Birbeck (RDFa), Ivan Herman
  By irc/telecon: Elisa, Ben, Michael, Simone

======================================================================
2. SWD review of "Cool URIs for the Semantic Web"
-- https://gnowsis.opendfki.de/repos/gnowsis/papers/2006_11_concepturi/html/cooluris_sweo_note.html

   Michael, Vit, and Ed should please post reviews in time
   for discussion on September 25 call. Goal is to provide
   feedback to SWEO by October 2 at latest.

======================================================================
3. SKOS - see http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#SKOS

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Amsterdam agenda topic: "Label relations" (Guus) 
-- Issue-26: RelationshipsBetweenLabels (http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/26)

ACTION: Guus to move ISSUE-26 forward [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action04]

ACTION: Guus to post user experience reports for ISSUE-26 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/03-swd-minutes.html#action05]

ACTION: Alistair to state the difference between the two flavours of the SimpleExtension proposal for issue 26 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-swd-minutes.html#action05]

For discussion on the telecon, from
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/AmsterdamAgenda#LabelRelations:

   Relevant issue:
    * [http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/26 '''Issue-26 - 
      RelationshipsBetweenLabels''' (open)]
    * Issue: SKOS allows to represent semantic relationships
      (broader, related) between concepts. It also allows
      to represent relationships between concepts and labels
      (prefLabel, altLabel). However, there is nothing proposed
      in SKOS to capture links between labels themselves, a
      configuration which sometimes happens in concept schemes.

   Required background reading:
    * [http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/RelationshipsBetweenLabels/ 
      SkosDesign RelationshipsBetweenLabels]

   Three options will be discussed in Amsterdam
    * [http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/RelationshipsBetweenLabels/ProposalFour 
      Alistair's "Minimal Label Relation" proposal]
    * [http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SkosDesign/RelationshipsBetweenLabels/ProposalThree 
      Guus "Simple Extension" proposal]
    * [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Sep/0013.html Guus "remove range 
      restriction for skos: prefLabel" proposal]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Amsterdam topic "Labeling properties" (Alistair)

For discussion on the telecon, from
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/AmsterdamAgenda#LabelingProperties:

 Relevant issue:
  * [http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/31 '''Issue-31 - BasicLexicalLabelSemantics''' (open)]
     * Issue: Can a resource have two "preferred lexical
       labels"? Can a lexical label be both "preferred" and
       "alternative" for the same resource? If a lexical label
       is "hidden", can it also be "preferred" or "alternative"
       for the same resource?  ...
 
 Proposed solution:
  * [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jun/0170.html
    Alistair, 2007-06-26]: Alistair proposes a section of
    the draft SKOS Semantics as a resolution for Issue 31 --
    http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/Semantics/Labelling?action=recall&rev=5.
    "This proposal deals with the intuitive semantics of
    'preferred', 'alternative' and 'hidden' at the syntactic
    level, which avoids complicated semantics conditions and
    allows for error-tolerant strategies to be defined."

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Amsterdam topic "Semantic Relation Properties" (Sean)
-- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/AmsterdamAgenda#SemanticRelationProperties

ACTION: Sean to prepare readings and discussion topics for Semantic Relation properties [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/18-swd-minutes.html#action06]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Amsterdam topic "Concept Semantics" (Antoine)
-- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/AmsterdamAgenda#ConceptSemantics

ACTION: Antoine to make wiki page or list posting summarizing issues for "Concept Semantics" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/18-swd-minutes.html#action07]

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Amsterdam topic "Drawing the picture" - no discussion leader yet

ACTION: Guus to email a proposal to the list about Issue-36 ConceptSchemeContainment [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/24-swd-minutes.html#action01]

 Problems to discuss:
  * Are relationships part of a concept scheme?
  * Are the concepts part of a concept scheme?
  * Capture underlying intuitions: UML diagrams? Blobs and lines?
  * What do we mean by "containment", "aggregation"...?
  * Are relationships of a concept somehow part of the concept?
  * Can concepts "exist" independently of a scheme?
  * Goal: see how things fit together in the larger picture.
 
 Relevant issues:
  * ISSUE-36 http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/36 - ConceptSchemeContainment (open)
  * Guus thoughts on ISSUE-36: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jul/0164.html
  * Alistair: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/UserStories useful for ISSUE-36?
 
 Reading:
  * http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Aug/0016.html
  * http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/public/ajm65/dc2007/tutorial.pdf
  * http://zthes.z3950.org/model/zthes-model-1.0.html
  * bs8273 - UML diagrams available?
  * Elisa/Clay/Ed/Jon: OMG, ISO 1087...?

======================================================================
4. RDFa - RDFa Overview document http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/

   Teleconferences take place Mondays, 1300-1400 UTC -    irc://irc.w3.org:6665/rdfa, conference code 7332# ('RDFa').
   Everyone interested in RDFa is invited to participate.

Telecon minutes 14 Sep:
http://www.w3.org/2007/09/14-rdfa-minutes.html

ACTION: Ralph update RDFa agendum for Amsterdam f2f after discussion with RDFa TF [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/04-swd-minutes.html#action08]

Amsterdam topic "RDFa"
-- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/AmsterdamAgenda#RDFa

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Questions from IPTC (Misha Wolf)
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Sep/0023.html

ACTION: Guus to raise question three from Misha's email -- statements (creator, date modified, confidence...) about statements -- with the RDFa group [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/11-swd-minutes.html#action11]

======================================================================
5. RECIPES - see http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#Recipes

ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" (http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/16) -- formerly known as "Recipe issue 1.3" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14]
-- see comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Sep/0036.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Amsterdam topic "Recipes" (Jon)

ACTION: Jon to clarify reading list and discussion points for Amsterdam agenda topic "Receipes" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/18-swd-minutes.html#action13]

======================================================================
6. VOCABULARY MANAGEMENT - see http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables#VocabularyMgt

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Current draft - http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/VocabMgtDraft

ACTION: Elisa will configure IPTC from Misha's email into vocabulary management documents [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/11-swd-minutes.html#action12]
-- see comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Sep/0035.html
-- however: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Sep/0031.html

ACTION: Elisa to ask for feedback on VM draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/08/21-swd-minutes.html#action06] 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Amsterdam topic "Vocabulary Management" (Ralph locally, Elisa remotely)

-- Vit suggestions: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Sep/0000.html

For discussion on the telecon, from
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/AmsterdamAgenda#VM:

 To be discussed late afternoon Monday 16:00+ so that Elisa can join.
 
 Discussion points:
 
 1. Overall document structure, section requirements and status (Elisa)
 
 2. Ontology Version Management (Vit) --
    Versioning Questionnaire Evaluation (Vit) - Survey Results [1]
    Reference Implementation of RDF-based Ontology Versioning (Vit) - SemVersion (Knowledge Web EU project) [2], [3].
    Further discussion regarding versioning best practices based on early results of diff capabilities (Vit)
 
    [1] http://smile.deri.ie/limesurvey/index.php?sid=2
    [2] http://semversion.ontoware.org/kwebd233b.pdf
    [3] http://semweb4j.org/site/semversion/
 
    Suggested Reading:
    * http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/VocabMgtDraft
    * http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2007Aug/0001.html
    * https://gnowsis.opendfki.de/repos/gnowsis/papers/2006_11_concepturi/html/index.html
    * http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/URI_Best_Practices
    * Daniel is liaison, SWD may be asked for review before publication
    * http://sites.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/suhl/bizer/pub/drafts/LinkedDataTutorial/


-- 
VU University Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
T: +31 20 598 7739/7718; F: +31 84 712 1446 
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/

Received on Monday, 24 September 2007 08:48:31 UTC