- From: Eric Neumann <eneumann@teranode.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 14:09:01 -0400
- To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 18:09:29 UTC
A recent paper has been published that addresses some of the same URI issues we've been discussing: "URI Identity Management for Semantic Web Data Integration and Linkage" http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/14361/ They focus on Coreference aka Record Linkages, which deals with the problem of having more than one URI for the "same thing". There's a probabilistic theory behind it, but it offers an approach different from using "owl:sameAs' between possible similar things. My take-- coming from a life sciences perspective-- is that we still need to standardize URI's to specific datarecords (e.g., uniprot, entrez, ensemble, etc) as well as concepts, but when we need to "cross-bundle" different records that are supposedly referring to the same bio-entity (uniprot/p12345 ~ entrez/g6422 ~ ensmeble/s47721), then this approach may be worth considering. I leave it to the group to discuss the possible value of this paper to our ongoing URI activity... Eric
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 18:09:29 UTC