public-sml@w3.org from July 2008 by date

Thursday, 31 July 2008

• [Bug 5925] New: Schema used to assess instance validity bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5924] New: Are violations of "Schema Component Rules" conformance or validity issues? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5923] New: Requirements on schema documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5922] New: Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-07-31 SML Telecon Pratul Dublish

Tuesday, 29 July 2008

• [Bug 5908] New: Contradiction around schemaBinding bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Monday, 28 July 2008

• [Bug 5902] New: sml:nilref and PSVI bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-07-24 SML Wilson, Kirk D
• [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Saturday, 26 July 2008

• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Bug 5543 Henry S. Thompson

Friday, 25 July 2008

• Bug 5543 Pratul Dublish
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Thursday, 24 July 2008

• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Regrets for 7/24 7/31 Lynn, James (HP Software)
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Monday, 21 July 2008

• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-07-24 SML Telecon Pratul Dublish

Friday, 18 July 2008

• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-07-17 telecon Sandy Gao

Thursday, 17 July 2008

• [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-07-17 SML Telecon Pratul Dublish

Wednesday, 16 July 2008

• [Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Tuesday, 15 July 2008

• RE: bug 5542 - new option 4 to consider Smith, Virginia (HP Software)

Monday, 14 July 2008

• [Bug 5653] Final vocabulary clean-up bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5824] Grammar change in sml:targetElement example text bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5760] definitions and uses of "target" disagree bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Thursday, 10 July 2008

• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-07-10 SML telecon Julia McCarthy
• [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5824] Grammar change in sml:targetElement example text bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5525] Confusing section names bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5525] Confusing section names bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 9 July 2008

• bug 5542 - new option 4 to consider John Arwe

Monday, 7 July 2008

• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-07-03 SML Telecon Sandy Gao
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-07-10 SML John Arwe

Thursday, 3 July 2008

• [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5790] reduce the "all bets are off" consequence of unreachable documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5656] Defining interoperability for user-defined reference schemes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [w3c sml][agenda] 2008-07-03 SML Telecon Pratul Dublish
• [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5790] reduce the "all bets are off" consequence of unreachable documents bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5740] Inconsistent requirements for using PSVI after 5541 adopted bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 5656] Defining interoperability for user-defined reference schemes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Wednesday, 2 July 2008

• RE: [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-06-23 SML face to face Wilson, Kirk D
• [w3c sml][minutes] 2008-06-24 SML f2f Kumar Pandit

Tuesday, 1 July 2008

• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-06-25 SML Face to Face Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
• [w3c sml] [minutes] 2008-06-23 SML face to face Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
• [Bug 5824] New: Grammar change in sml:targetElement example text bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Last message date: Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:45:52 UTC