- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:35:20 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5924 Summary: Are violations of "Schema Component Rules" conformance or validity issues? Product: SML Version: LC Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: sandygao@ca.ibm.com QAContact: public-sml@w3.org For example, section 5.2.1.1 forbids <sml:key ref="name1" name="name2"/> ("ref" and "name" can't both be present.) Should this make the containing SML model nonconformant or invalid? Given that "bad" schema documents makes the model nonconformant, the same should be true for SML constraints, but the conformance rules in section 8 doesn't seem to cover this case. The closest is in the "validity" list: "3. Each document in the model MUST satisfy all normative statements in this specification that pertain to model documents." We need to add part of this to the conformance requirement list. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:35:56 UTC