bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
- [Bug 5925] New: Schema used to assess instance validity (Thursday, 31 July)
- [Bug 5924] New: Are violations of "Schema Component Rules" conformance or validity issues? (Thursday, 31 July)
- [Bug 5923] New: Requirements on schema documents (Thursday, 31 July)
- [Bug 5922] New: Allow an instance document to not be bound to any schema (Thursday, 31 July)
- [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified (Thursday, 31 July)
- [Bug 5908] New: Contradiction around schemaBinding (Tuesday, 29 July)
- [Bug 5902] New: sml:nilref and PSVI (Monday, 28 July)
- [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 (Monday, 28 July)
- [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 (Monday, 28 July)
- [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained (Saturday, 26 July)
- [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized (Friday, 25 July)
- [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained (Friday, 25 July)
- [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized (Friday, 25 July)
- [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained (Thursday, 24 July)
- [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized (Thursday, 24 July)
- [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized (Thursday, 24 July)
- [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized (Thursday, 24 July)
- [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified (Thursday, 17 July)
- [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained (Thursday, 17 July)
- [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized (Thursday, 17 July)
- [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized (Thursday, 17 July)
- [Bug 5542] How are SML URIs absolutized (Thursday, 17 July)
- [Bug 5657] Define implementation-defined and -dependent, use consistently (Wednesday, 16 July)
- [Bug 5653] Final vocabulary clean-up (Monday, 14 July)
- [Bug 5824] Grammar change in sml:targetElement example text (Monday, 14 July)
- [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 (Monday, 14 July)
- [Bug 5760] definitions and uses of "target" disagree (Monday, 14 July)
- [Bug 5720] Inconsistent languge describing sml references and schemes (Monday, 14 July)
- [Bug 5636] why prohibit rules on local decls/defs described by other specs? (Monday, 14 July)
- [Bug 5797] SML validity appeal to schema-validity is underspecified (Thursday, 10 July)
- [Bug 5824] Grammar change in sml:targetElement example text (Thursday, 10 July)
- [Bug 5524] Rename section 4.4.1.1 (Thursday, 10 July)
- [Bug 5525] Confusing section names (Thursday, 10 July)
- [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained (Thursday, 10 July)
- [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained (Thursday, 10 July)
- [Bug 5525] Confusing section names (Thursday, 10 July)
- [Bug 5543] SML URI seems overconstrained (Thursday, 3 July)
- [Bug 5519] Relationship between SML model validity and XSD validity assessment needs to be precisely defined (Thursday, 3 July)
- [Bug 5790] reduce the "all bets are off" consequence of unreachable documents (Thursday, 3 July)
- [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help (Thursday, 3 July)
- [Bug 5656] Defining interoperability for user-defined reference schemes (Thursday, 3 July)
- [Bug 5721] Statement about definitions in definition docs vs. instance docs would help (Thursday, 3 July)
- [Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string (Thursday, 3 July)
- [Bug 5790] reduce the "all bets are off" consequence of unreachable documents (Thursday, 3 July)
- [Bug 5707] clarify SML reference resolution when sml:uri value is an empty string (Thursday, 3 July)
- [Bug 5740] Inconsistent requirements for using PSVI after 5541 adopted (Thursday, 3 July)
- [Bug 5656] Defining interoperability for user-defined reference schemes (Thursday, 3 July)
- [Bug 5824] New: Grammar change in sml:targetElement example text (Tuesday, 1 July)
Henry S. Thompson
John Arwe
Julia McCarthy
Kumar Pandit
Lynn, James (HP Software)
Pratul Dublish
Sandy Gao
Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
Wilson, Kirk D
Last message date: Thursday, 31 July 2008 20:45:52 UTC