W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sdw-wg@w3.org > April 2017

SSN ontology licences, Was: Agenda SSN meeting this week - 11-04-17 20:00 - 22:00 UTC

From: Maxime Lefrançois <maxime.lefrancois@emse.fr>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:58:34 +0000
Message-ID: <CALsPASVzGiLUP0eNCk1yWK=QJgYoRK_QQTNnrz+y2OV87RwneQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es>, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au>, "public-sdw-wg@w3.org" <public-sdw-wg@w3.org>
Dear Raúl,

I see that your collegue Víctor Rodríguez Doncel says that it is not common
to have two licences for one ontology, and he suggests to create a unified
text and say explicitly that both W3C and OGC must be attributed.

Should we do this? How? Who?


I also updated a little bit the wiki, and dissociate the two options where:
 a. we use cc:licence
 b. we use dcterms:licence

As discussed already, option (b) might be actually preferable because:
 1. it avoids using a new vocabulary for just one term
 2. the W3C and OGC licences are not Creative Common licences, so
dcterms:licence is more generic

Best,
Maxime


Le lun. 10 avr. 2017 à 11:03, Raúl García Castro <rgarcia@fi.upm.es> a
écrit :

> Dear all,
>
> My regrets for the meeting.
>
> Regarding ACTION-274, I already finished it and reported by email:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-wg/2017Mar/0063.html
>
> with more details in the wiki:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Ontology_rights_and_licence#Comments_from_V.C3.ADctor_Rodr.C3.ADguez_Doncel
>
> Kind regards,
>
> El 10/4/17 a las 9:44, Armin Haller escribió:
> > *This week we will again have a two-hour meeting, but with only one part
> > as there are no SOSA specific issues left.*
> >
> > * *
> >
> > *Agenda for SSN-focused meeting 11 April 2017 20:00 - 22:00 UTC
> > <
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20170411T20&ah=1&msg=SSN%20Call
> >*
> >
> >  1. Progress on ACTION-296
> >     <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/296> to address role
> >     of device class as of ISSUE-153
> >     <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/153> and propose a
> >     solution
> >  2. Progress on ACTION-302
> >     <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/302> for options in
> >     regards to Sensing class in SSN new
> >  3. Deprecate ssn:SensorDataSheet as suggested in ISSUE-121
> >     <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/121>
> >  4. Progress on ACTION-304
> >     <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/304> to investigate
> >     the need of a complex result time property in SSN new
> >  5. Progress on ACTION-273
> >     <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/273> for François
> >     Daoust to check whether we can/should add licence statement to /ns
> >     docs and, if so, which one
> >  6. Progress on ACTION-274
> >     <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/actions/274> for Raul to
> >     check with a colleague on a way to formalise licenses in ontology
> >  7. Decision on whether Platforms may be attached to Platforms ISSUE-154
> >     <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/154>
> >  8. Address ISSUE-152 <https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/track/issues/152>
> >     whether DUL alignments for Platform are in sync
> >  9. If time permits, go through
> >     https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Open_Issues
> >
> >
> >
> > Further details and dial in
> > instructions:
> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Meetings:SSN-Telecon20170411
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Armin
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Dr. Raúl García Castro
> http://www.garcia-castro.com/
>
> Ontology Engineering Group
> Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
> Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Informáticos
> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
> Campus de Montegancedo, s/n - Boadilla del Monte - 28660 Madrid
> Phone: +34 91 336 65 96 <+34%20913%2036%2065%2096> - Fax: +34 91 352 48 19
> <+34%20913%2052%2048%2019>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 11 April 2017 09:59:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 11 April 2017 09:59:21 UTC