Re: Presentation about reifiers and graphs

A quick follow-up: I have moved the slides about (named) graphs from
[1] to a separate deck [2], for use in subsequent WG discussions.

(I also did some small edits [3].)

Best regards,
Niklas

[1]: <https://niklasl.github.io/rdf-docs/presentations/RDF-reifiers-1/>
[2]: <https://niklasl.github.io/rdf-docs/presentations/RDF-reifiers-1/graphs.html>
[3]: <https://github.com/niklasl/rdf-docs/commit/f907b303ca3925162743a2d7c93fe581b907731c>

On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 11:30 PM Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Thank you all for the valuable feedback! I've read all replies
> (including those off-list) and much appreciate the help. (My lack of
> replying is due to lack of time.) Alas, I've not yet been able to
> collate and address it all (I was away on a conference), but I've
> updated the presentation with some few adjustments and additions (it
> is still at [1], with diffs at [2]).
>
> The goal is to introduce reifiers, and also to compare them to graphs
> and named graphs, since questions about their differences are
> recurring. I want this to make sense practically, without straying
> from formal definitions. As expected, there are some disputed points;
> and I appreciate all help in reaching these goals. I'm sure the
> presentation can be made shorter, clearer, and more inclusive.
>
> (If I sense there is enough rough consensus on its message, I'd be
> happy to present this at TPAC on behalf of the group.)
>
> Best regards,
> Niklas
>
> [1]: <https://niklasl.github.io/rdf-docs/presentations/RDF-reifiers-1/>
> [2]: <https://github.com/niklasl/rdf-docs/compare/main...dev>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 1:28 PM Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I've drafted a presentation for the purpose of introducing reifiers
> > and comparing them to graphs. It's currently at:
> > https://niklasl.github.io/rdf-docs/presentations/RDF-reifiers-1/
> >
> > Ora: you're of course free to take what you like and discard the rest
> > for your TPAC slides.
> >
> > I tried to keep it on par with the baseline, but of course there may
> > be wording in there still to be agreed upon. If you see fit I can make
> > a PR for further collaboration in getting a version of it to
> > https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg/tree/main/docs.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Niklas

Received on Friday, 20 September 2024 14:02:50 UTC