$this in Aggregations
a problem with shapes and constraints
editorial comment on https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/ff393869ede0843fd9135542c4da7f61e500d1b1?diff=split
eliminating property constraints
incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components
more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape]
on ISSUE-196
on property paths in SHACL
on removing pre-binding from the core of SHACL
on the closing of ISSUE-155
read-through of Sections 5 and 7
read-through of Sections 5 and 7 (response to section 5)
read-through of Sections 5 and 7 (response to section 7)
some comments on SHACL editors' draft of 8 November
test suite data structures
two interesting test cases for SHACL
- Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 15 November)
- Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 15 November)
- Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 15 November)
- Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 15 November)
- Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 15 November)
- Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 15 November)
- Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 15 November)
- Holger Knublauch (Monday, 14 November)
- Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 14 November)
- Holger Knublauch (Monday, 14 November)
- Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 14 November)
undocumented changes to SHACL
Using SHACL at the Europeana Foundation to validate EDM
why retain sh:predicate in property constraints?
Last message date: Tuesday, 29 November 2016 12:13:30 UTC