Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components

Thanks for pointing this out, I have tried to address this here:

https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/d721ec279674bb5eb27020585899ed16629ce32e

Holger


On 23/11/2016 5:15, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> "sh:equals can be used to verify that the set of value nodes is equal to the
> set of nodes that have the focus node as subject and the value of sh:equals as
> predicate."
>
> This does not make any sense.  There is similar wording for other property
> pair constraint components.
>
> There are also wording problems in this section including:
>
> "not exist as value" -> "not exist as a value"
>
> The definition blocks use different wording for the same notions.
>
>
> Someone in the working group really needs to take a close look at the entire
> document to systematically check for problems of this sort.
>
>
> Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> Nuance Communications
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 23:23:52 UTC