- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 12:33:19 +1000
- To: public-rdf-shapes@w3.org
I have clarified both items in the change history: https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/aefdf0a128bbd9cdcf7f1cdc9062f6795d913f60 Are there any other cases? Your "For example, ..." seems to indicate you have found others? Holger On 23/11/2016 0:52, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > There have been recent changes to SHACL as defined in the editors' draft of > "Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL)" that do not show up in the revision > history section of the document. > > For example, there was a recent change in the document to what makes a shape > in SHACL. This change is not mentioned in the revision history at all. > Further, the git commit message labels the change as a clarification, which it > is not. > > Other changes to the document are inadequately described in the revision > history section. > > For example, the addition of normative force for > w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/shacl.ttl is simply labelled as adding a link, > with no indication that this could have made wide-reaching changes to SHACL. > The git commit message is no more informative. > > > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > Nuance Communications > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2016 02:33:54 UTC