public-rdf-shapes@w3.org from November 2016 by author

Dimitris Kontokostas

Re: on property paths in SHACL (Monday, 28 November)
Re: more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape] (Monday, 21 November)
Re: more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape] (Monday, 21 November)
Re: on property paths in SHACL (Monday, 21 November)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

test suite data structures (Tuesday, 22 November)

Holger Knublauch

Re: read-through of Sections 5 and 7 (response to section 7) (Monday, 28 November)
Re: read-through of Sections 5 and 7 (response to section 5) (Monday, 28 November)
Re: undocumented changes to SHACL (Wednesday, 23 November)
Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components (Wednesday, 23 November)
Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: on the closing of ISSUE-155 (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: editorial comment on https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/ff393869ede0843fd9135542c4da7f61e500d1b1?diff=split (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: $this in Aggregations (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape] (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL (Tuesday, 15 November)
Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL (Tuesday, 15 November)
Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL (Tuesday, 15 November)
Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL (Monday, 14 November)
Re: some comments on SHACL editors' draft of 8 November (Monday, 14 November)
Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL (Monday, 14 November)

Hugo Manguinhas

Using SHACL at the Europeana Foundation to validate EDM (Tuesday, 22 November)

Irene Polikoff

Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components (Wednesday, 23 November)
Re: on the closing of ISSUE-155 (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape] (Tuesday, 22 November)

Karen Coyle

Re: read-through of Sections 5 and 7 (Sunday, 27 November)
Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components (Wednesday, 23 November)
Re: eliminating property constraints (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: eliminating property constraints (Sunday, 20 November)
Re: on removing pre-binding from the core of SHACL (Sunday, 13 November)
Re: some comments on SHACL editors' draft of 8 November (Sunday, 13 November)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

why retain sh:predicate in property constraints? (Tuesday, 29 November)
a problem with shapes and constraints (Tuesday, 29 November)
Re: on property paths in SHACL (Monday, 28 November)
read-through of Sections 5 and 7 (Saturday, 26 November)
Re: incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components (Tuesday, 22 November)
editorial comment on https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/ff393869ede0843fd9135542c4da7f61e500d1b1?diff=split (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: $this in Aggregations (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: on the closing of ISSUE-155 (Tuesday, 22 November)
incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: eliminating property constraints (Tuesday, 22 November)
undocumented changes to SHACL (Tuesday, 22 November)
on ISSUE-196 (Tuesday, 22 November)
Re: on property paths in SHACL (Monday, 21 November)
Re: more on recursion [was Re: fun with sh:hasShape] (Monday, 21 November)
eliminating property constraints (Saturday, 19 November)
Re: some comments on SHACL editors' draft of 8 November (Thursday, 17 November)
Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL (Tuesday, 15 November)
Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL (Tuesday, 15 November)
Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL (Tuesday, 15 November)
Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL (Tuesday, 15 November)
Re: two interesting test cases for SHACL (Monday, 14 November)
two interesting test cases for SHACL (Monday, 14 November)
Re: on removing pre-binding from the core of SHACL (Saturday, 12 November)
on removing pre-binding from the core of SHACL (Saturday, 12 November)
some comments on SHACL editors' draft of 8 November (Friday, 11 November)

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 November 2016 12:13:30 UTC