incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components

"sh:equals can be used to verify that the set of value nodes is equal to the
set of nodes that have the focus node as subject and the value of sh:equals as
predicate."

This does not make any sense.  There is similar wording for other property
pair constraint components.

There are also wording problems in this section including:

"not exist as value" -> "not exist as a value"

The definition blocks use different wording for the same notions.


Someone in the working group really needs to take a close look at the entire
document to systematically check for problems of this sort.


Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Nuance Communications

Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 19:16:06 UTC