W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-shapes@w3.org > November 2016

incoherent descriptions of property pair constraint components

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:15:32 -0800
To: "public-rdf-shapes@w3.org" <public-rdf-shapes@w3.org>
Message-ID: <d74579cf-0d87-deef-7246-1814b02e5200@gmail.com>
"sh:equals can be used to verify that the set of value nodes is equal to the
set of nodes that have the focus node as subject and the value of sh:equals as
predicate."

This does not make any sense.  There is similar wording for other property
pair constraint components.

There are also wording problems in this section including:

"not exist as value" -> "not exist as a value"

The definition blocks use different wording for the same notions.


Someone in the working group really needs to take a close look at the entire
document to systematically check for problems of this sort.


Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Nuance Communications
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 19:16:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:02:46 UTC