[meetings] Pull Request: Add slides from our buy-side session
Re: [patwg-charter] Moving forward on PATWG Charter Submission (#37)
- Re: [patwg-charter] Moving forward on PATWG Charter Submission (#37)
- Re: [patwg-charter] Moving forward on PATWG Charter Submission (#37)
- Re: [patwg-charter] Moving forward on PATWG Charter Submission (#37)
[meetings] Pull Request: add slides for Layering Ideas
[docs-and-reports] Pull Request: hyphenate proposal-specific
- Re: [docs-and-reports] hyphenate proposal-specific (#27)
- [docs-and-reports] Merged Pull Request: hyphenate proposal-specific
[docs-and-reports] Pull Request: clarify and expand TEE manufacturer assets
[docs-and-reports] Merged Pull Request: Private Computation Abstraction (MPC and TEEs)
[docs-and-reports] Complete section "1.9 Operators of TEEs" (#25)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Complete section "1.9 Operators of TEEs" (#25)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Complete section "1.9 Operators of TEEs" (#25)
[docs-and-reports] Include FHE as an instantiation of private computation (#24)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Include FHE as an instantiation of private computation (#24)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Include FHE as an instantiation of private computation (#24)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Include FHE as an instantiation of private computation (#24)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Include FHE as an instantiation of private computation (#24)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Include FHE as an instantiation of private computation (#24)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Include FHE as an instantiation of private computation (#24)
[docs-and-reports] I think it is reasonable to consider the case where there is a single coordinator. In that model, to violate user privacy, collusion still needs to happen since the coordinator must collude with the report collector (similar to a 2-pc MPC with the report collector acting as an aggregator). (#23)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Helper Party networks with a single coordinator vs multiple coordinators (#23)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Helper Party networks with a single coordinator vs multiple coordinators (#23)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Helper Party networks with a single coordinator vs multiple coordinators (#23)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Helper Party networks with a single coordinator vs multiple coordinators (#23)
[docs-and-reports] Abstract MPC beyond secret sharing based MPC (#22)
[docs-and-reports] Should we include a mitigation for running coordinators across multiple cloud providers? (#21)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Should we include a mitigation for running coordinators across multiple cloud providers? (#21)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Should we include a mitigation for running coordinators across multiple cloud providers? (#21)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Should we include a mitigation for running coordinators across multiple cloud providers? (#21)
[docs-and-reports] Collusion within and across helper party networks (#20)
[docs-and-reports] Who is assumed to have access to first and delegated party assets? (#19)
[docs-and-reports] Pull Request: Add design-dimensions document
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Add design-dimensions document (#18)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Add design-dimensions document (#18)
[docs-and-reports] Pull Request: rename threat-model doc to threat-model/readme.md
[meetings] Pull Request: Setting up agenda for oct meeting
[docs-and-reports] Expand on privacy budgeting (#16)
[docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Privacy and Purpose Constraints (#15)
Re: [proposals] Fix explainers link in README (#3)
[meetings] Pull Request: Dates are hard
Re: [docs-and-reports] Private Computation Abstraction (MPC and TEEs) (#14)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Private Computation Abstraction (MPC and TEEs) (#14)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Private Computation Abstraction (MPC and TEEs) (#14)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Private Computation Abstraction (MPC and TEEs) (#14)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Private Computation Abstraction (MPC and TEEs) (#14)
- Re: [docs-and-reports] Private Computation Abstraction (MPC and TEEs) (#14)
[meetings] Agenda Request - TEEs and MPC in the Threat Model (#81)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - TEEs and MPC in the Threat Model (#81)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - TEEs and MPC in the Threat Model (#81)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - TEEs and MPC in the Threat Model (#81)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - TEEs and MPC in the Threat Model (#81)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - TEEs and MPC in the Threat Model (#81)
[meetings] Questions for the buy side? Put them on the queue in advance here. (#80)
- Re: [meetings] Questions for the buy side? Put them on the queue in advance here. (#80)
- Re: [meetings] Questions for the buy side? Put them on the queue in advance here. (#80)
- Re: [meetings] Questions for the buy side? Put them on the queue in advance here. (#80)
- Re: [meetings] Questions for the buy side? Put them on the queue in advance here. (#80)
- Re: [meetings] Questions for the buy side? Put them on the queue in advance here. (#80)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Measurement use-cases deep dive and requirements (#51)
[patwg-charter] Mark single-implementation features "at risk" instead of distinguishing the CR-draft stage (#42)
[proposals] Use cases and principles for Attribution/Measurement proposals (#14)
[meetings] Agenda Notice - Forming until target Agenda Complete date of Oct. 11 (#79)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Notice - Forming until target Agenda Complete date of Oct. 11 (#79)
- Closed: [meetings] Agenda Notice - Forming until target Agenda Complete date of Oct. 11 (#79)
[meetings] Agenda Request - Private Measurement Document (#78)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Private Measurement Document (#78)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Private Measurement Document (#78)
Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59)
- Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - Buy-side use cases + requirements deep dive. (#59)