- From: James Aylett via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 07:34:05 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
> I might avoid using "purposes" +1 > and instead using something like "application". "technical proscription of data application" could just be "technical application proscription" or even "proscription" in colloquial usage. The reason I used 'inhibition' is that it accepts that although some things _can_ be completely prevented by technical design, some things may only be possible to make harder (and ideally less powerful also). I'm not sure 'proscription' conveys that - 'constrained' would work for me. However at this point we may now indeed be bike shedding, so I won't object if others are happy. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jaylett-annalect Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/docs-and-reports/issues/15#issuecomment-1291619514 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2022 07:34:06 UTC