- From: Erik Taubeneck via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:58:09 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
Ok, that works for me.
I've been turning over the multi-party idea (wrt this and other parts), and I realized the constraint I've been circling around is the idea that we likely want 2 (or more) parties who are *known up front* and can be trusted to reach some conditions (typically non-collusion.) This was my concern with the single coordinator model, as one of the parties is the report collector, who is not known up front. I additionally wasn't sure if the client/user would be considered one of these parties, but maybe that point is moot due to the scale.
I'm fine with this addition, and will work in the *known up front* part elsewhere.
_Originally posted by @eriktaubeneck in https://github.com/patcg/docs-and-reports/pull/14#discussion_r999917129_
--
GitHub Notification of comment by eriktaubeneck
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/docs-and-reports/issues/24#issuecomment-1287379914 using your GitHub account
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 21 October 2022 19:58:10 UTC