- From: Dr. David Filip <David.Filip@ul.ie>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 10:10:28 +0100
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Cc: "Dr. David Filip" <David.Filip@ul.ie>, "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANw5LK=sYWxECzObYoS3SV9qx9-fmmYP9=t7GrS21D1wyCLhew@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Felix, my responses inline Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 *cellphone: +353-86-0222-158* facsimile: +353-6120-2734 mailto: david.filip@ul.ie On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote: > Hi David, > > Am 15.05.13 23:23, schrieb Dr. David Filip: > > Felix, I do not have an issue with your proposed publishing date,*provided that all spec and schema changes discussed today are implemented > by that time.* > > > Could you please list in this thread what you mean by "all spec and schema > changes", so that we are sure we are in sync? I am happy to do the edits, > but need to know which one. > As per minutes, changes regarding extensibility *both in spec and schema.* *Spec changes are pending consensus on action-527* * * Also the changes regarding <script> should be implemented, there seems to be consensus in the discussion thread with Silvia and others. So this should not be an issue. * * > > > > However, I do not agree that introducing extensibility and changing > schema is not a substantive change. Anyway, I would hardly call it > editorial. Extensibility in this sense has not been discussed before and we > do not have a stable spec change to reflect it by now. > > > For this one see the mails from Jirka and Yves. Could you provide feedback > on these by Friday EOB? Otherwise I would go ahead with the publication. > I just reacted to those > > The botttom line for this "response deadline" is that we only should delay > the draft publication of people are able to take the time to discuss. > > Best, > > Felix > > > My opinion is that it is better to lose one week now than many weeks > later on if the change is pushed into the second last call. > > Rgds > dF > > Dr. David Filip > ======================= > LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS > University of Limerick, Ireland > telephone: +353-6120-2781 > *cellphone: +353-86-0222-158* > facsimile: +353-6120-2734 > mailto: david.filip@ul.ie > > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I read in today's raw meeting minutes >> http://www.w3.org/2013/05/15-mlw-lt-minutes.html >> "skipping topic: Consensus to publish Last Call" >> Why is that? Because of the extension change which is not normative? If >> that's the case I propose to do the following: >> >> - If there is no disagreement on action-527 >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013May/0139.html >> by Friday EOB >> and no other substantive issue comes up, I will prepare the publication, >> to be done Tuesday 21 May. >> >> Wrt to the HTML reference for "elements within text": changing just the >> pointers to groups of elements in HTML5 (e.g. "phrasing content") and list >> elements explicitly (e.g. "script") won't warrant a last call delay. Of >> course, if the HTML references are resolved by Monday EOB next week (that >> would be needed for publication on Tuesday), that's even better. >> >> If you disagree with this approach and esp. if you see other issues, >> please state that in this thread asap. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Felix >> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 09:11:36 UTC