Re: Next last call publication & question on todays meeting

I disagree with the solution proposed for action-527.
The spec must explicitly list extensibility points IMHO, in order to make
the schema changes.

Dr. David Filip
University of Limerick, Ireland
telephone: +353-6120-2781
*cellphone: +353-86-0222-158*
facsimile: +353-6120-2734

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Felix Sasaki <> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I read in today's raw meeting minutes
> "skipping topic: Consensus to publish Last Call"
> Why is that? Because of the extension change which is not normative? If
> that's the case I propose to do the following:
> - If there is no disagreement on action-527
> lt/2013May/0139.html<>
> by Friday EOB
> and no other substantive issue comes up, I will prepare the publication,
> to be done Tuesday 21 May.
> Wrt to the HTML reference for "elements within text": changing just the
> pointers to groups of elements in HTML5 (e.g. "phrasing content") and list
> elements explicitly (e.g. "script") won't warrant a last call delay. Of
> course, if the HTML references are resolved by Monday EOB next week (that
> would be needed for publication on Tuesday), that's even better.
> If you disagree with this approach and esp. if you see other issues,
> please state that in this thread asap.
> Thanks,
> Felix

Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 09:03:46 UTC