RE: Small issue with TAWS

+1 for #3 or #2 (whatever is doable by the tool).

-ys


-----Original Message-----
From: Mārcis Pinnis [mailto:marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv] 
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 8:35 AM
To: Yves Savourel
Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org; Pēteris Ņikiforovs; Artūrs Vasiļevskis
Subject: RE: Small issue with TAWS

Hi Yves,

Thanks for noticing ...
I registered the bug and we will sort it out.

However, there are multiple options on how to approach the issue (actually - 3 options as I see it):
1) We overwrite the existing annotatorsRef. This may not be good as not all mark-up will be provided by the last annotator.
2) We add the annotatorsRef in such cases to each element that is annotated with term="yes". This will create a heavy document with a lot of mark-up that could be avoided.
3) We add the annotatorsRef just to the elements that are nearest to the document's root element and below which there is no existing mark-up and below which there is at least one element annotated with term="yes".

I would prefer the last, however, in the case if there is a lot of existing mark-up this will look very similar to the 2nd option. What would you (others) prefer?

Best regards,
Mārcis ;o)

-----Original Message-----
From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com] 
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2013 3:48 PM
To: Mārcis Pinnis
Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Subject: Small issue with TAWS

Hi Mārcis, all,

Just one small issue that I noticed with Tilde's nice Web service:

When I submit an HTML document with some existing ITS markup for Terminology, the its-annotators-ref attribute has duplicated values on output.

for example if I submit a document with:

<body its-annotators-ref="terminology|T1">

I get in output:

<body its-annotators-ref="terminology|T1 terminology|http://tilde.com/term-annotation-service">

Looking at the latest editor's draft (http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#its-tool-annotation) I don't think we explicitly state that only one occurrence of each data categories can be specified per annotatorsRef attribute, so I'm not 100% sure we cannot have two occurrences of terminology, but so far I was interpreting that we were to use only one occurrence.

Thoughts?

cheers,
-ys

Received on Sunday, 12 May 2013 21:01:19 UTC