W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > May 2013

RE: Localization Quality Rating and global rules

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 11:52:12 -0600
To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>
CC: <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <004801ce475d$c733e280$559ba780$@com>
Thanks for the pointer Felix.
I have nothing against it. I was just not remembering it.

The 'Yes' in the column "Global, rule-based selection" still need to be changed to "No".

-ys


-----Original Message-----
From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] 
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 11:46 AM
To: Yves Savourel
Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Subject: Re: Localization Quality Rating and global rules

Hi Yves, all,

the current inheritance model + "no global rules" was a decision we made before the last call draft publication in December. See

http://www.w3.org/2012/11/28-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item01

If there is no strong demand to change this, I would leave things as is.

Best,

Felix

Am 02.05.13 18:34, schrieb Yves Savourel:
> Hi all,
>
> In the table of the defaults, etc.:
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.
> html#datacategories-defaults-etc
>
> The LQR data category says 'yes' for the column "Global, rule-based selection"
> But that's not correct as LQR is defined only for local rules:
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.
> html#lqrating
>
> And this also means we can't set the LQR to a translatable attribute since the LQR inheritance is "Textual content of element, including child elements, but excluding attributes"
>
> Maybe there is a good reason to not have global rules for LQR, but I can't recall.
> BTW: it's seems to be the only data category working with local markup only.
>
> -ys
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 17:52:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:32:08 UTC