- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 08:37:05 +0200
- To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
- CC: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Am 02.05.13 19:52, schrieb Yves Savourel: > Thanks for the pointer Felix. > I have nothing against it. I was just not remembering it. > > The 'Yes' in the column "Global, rule-based selection" still need to be changed to "No". Thanks, Yves, done. Best, Felix > > -ys > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 11:46 AM > To: Yves Savourel > Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > Subject: Re: Localization Quality Rating and global rules > > Hi Yves, all, > > the current inheritance model + "no global rules" was a decision we made before the last call draft publication in December. See > > http://www.w3.org/2012/11/28-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item01 > > If there is no strong demand to change this, I would leave things as is. > > Best, > > Felix > > Am 02.05.13 18:34, schrieb Yves Savourel: >> Hi all, >> >> In the table of the defaults, etc.: >> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20. >> html#datacategories-defaults-etc >> >> The LQR data category says 'yes' for the column "Global, rule-based selection" >> But that's not correct as LQR is defined only for local rules: >> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20. >> html#lqrating >> >> And this also means we can't set the LQR to a translatable attribute since the LQR inheritance is "Textual content of element, including child elements, but excluding attributes" >> >> Maybe there is a good reason to not have global rules for LQR, but I can't recall. >> BTW: it's seems to be the only data category working with local markup only. >> >> -ys >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 3 May 2013 06:37:35 UTC