W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > September 2010

RE: Music/Audio and MA

From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:02:35 +0200
To: 'Yves Raimond' <yves.raimond@bbc.co.uk>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7D1656F54141C042A1B2556AE5237D60010CEEB7F2D8@GVAMAIL.gva.ebu.ch>
Hello Yves,

I don't know what the others think but I guess there is nothing preventing ma-ont from describing music resources or at least providing a minimum / basic mapping to music ontologies. Ma-ont doesn't (IMHO) have the ambition to make specialised ontologies. It is more a bridging tool.



-----Original Message-----
From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yves Raimond
Sent: mercredi, 29. septembre 2010 11:31
To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Music/Audio and MA


At the very start of this group, I asked a question asking whether
music was in scope [1] and I got told that the primary focus was
video. Now MA is getting closer to a recommendation, I was wondering
whether that statement could/should be made explicitly in the Ontology
for Media Resource document. We keep getting requests in the Music
Ontology specification group about compatibility with MA, and a clear
statement would definitely help us. That, or working together to see
how MA could be applied in a music/audio context.

Kind regards,

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Nov/0111.html

This email and any files transmitted with it 
are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. 
If you have received this email in error, 
please notify the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email 
message has been swept by the mailgateway

Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 12:03:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:24:43 UTC