- From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:02:35 +0200
- To: 'Yves Raimond' <yves.raimond@bbc.co.uk>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Hello Yves, I don't know what the others think but I guess there is nothing preventing ma-ont from describing music resources or at least providing a minimum / basic mapping to music ontologies. Ma-ont doesn't (IMHO) have the ambition to make specialised ontologies. It is more a bridging tool. Regards, Jean-Pierre -----Original Message----- From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yves Raimond Sent: mercredi, 29. septembre 2010 11:31 To: public-media-annotation@w3.org Subject: Music/Audio and MA Hello, At the very start of this group, I asked a question asking whether music was in scope [1] and I got told that the primary focus was video. Now MA is getting closer to a recommendation, I was wondering whether that statement could/should be made explicitly in the Ontology for Media Resource document. We keep getting requests in the Music Ontology specification group about compatibility with MA, and a clear statement would definitely help us. That, or working together to see how MA could be applied in a music/audio context. Kind regards, Yves [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2008Nov/0111.html ----------------------------------------- ************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by the mailgateway **************************************************
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 12:03:13 UTC