Re: [AGENDA] Media Annotations WG Teleconf - 2010-12-07

Hi all,

sorry, i cannot make it - i have to do urgent work for a project presentation.

Regarding my open action items:

#269 - please close it...we have talked about this quite a few times
#360 - i will come up with a proposal after 16.12.
#373 - also will do the review after 16.12.

Sorry, but at the moment i am quiet busy with our presenation :(

Best,
Florian

Am 05.12.2010 um 11:16 schrieb Joakim Söderberg:

> Hello everyone,
> Here is the agenda for next telecon. We will focus on the proposed updates to the abstract ontology.
>  
> Please have a look at your (new and old) open actions. For example we are missing LC comment reviews from Daniel (a-334,343), Wonsuk (a-328) and Jean-Pierre (a-348).
>  
> Regards
> /Joakim
>  
>  
> -------------------------------
> 1. Convene
> Media Annotations WG
> Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 6294 ("MAWG") Alternative dial numbers:
> France (Nice): +33.4.26.46.79.03
> UK (Bristol) : +44.117.370.6152
> IRC channel: #mediaann
> Tuesday 2010-12-07 12:00-13:00 UTC, (ie, Amsterdam, Paris, Stockholm 13:00)
> Regrets:
> Chair: Joakim
> Scribe: TBA
>  
> Minutes to appear: http://www.w3.org/2010/12/07-mediaann-minutes.html
> Propose to accept F2F minutes: http://www.w3.org/2010/11/30-mediaann-minutes.html
>  
> 2. Next meeting
> Tuesday 2010-12-14
>  
> 3. Items
> [A] Action items:
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open
>  
> [B] Discuss the set of changes to the (abstract) Ontology, summarized here by Jean-Pierre:
>  
> - It is proposed to add track as a sub-class of fragment to help aligning with MFWG
> - It is proposed to add videoTrack and audioTrack to which currently existing specialised properties like frameRate or sampleRate will be more specifically linked as well as a better use of the compression property
> - It is proposed to add captioningTrack to better align with MFWG and also to address subtitling more properly
>  
> - It is proposed to change createDate (or creationDate) as "date" and list createDate (or creationDate) at the same level as releaseDate, etc.  This allows better hierarchical representation of dates in the RDF ontology as, for example, releaseDate cannot be considered as a subclass of createDate?
>  
> - RatingValue should be float but it should now have been corrected in the API following today review of actions.
>  
> - language and compression should allow string but also anyURI values, which would allow using SKOS concepts from classification schemes
>  
> [C] Follow up on Implementation of LC comments
>  
> 1- Media Ontology spec
>  
> -- LC Comment -2405:  JP Evain:
> Introduction
> -          Note to implementers, content authors - not really explicit, maybe these roles should be mentioned saying things like "it is expected that implementers will do."  ". to the benefit of content providers", etc.
>  
> -          There is no section 1.1 on the purpose of the specification (yet)
>  
> Section 4.1 core property definitions -> now section 5.1
> -          The ma: prefix still appears in the table but since the comment was made Pierre Antoine, while working on the mapping table suggested that the prefix should only be used with the ma-ont namespace in the RDF -> reconsider position?
>  
> Section 4.2.2 - no change as explained in previous response - tables in line -> now 5.2.2
>  
> Joakim: "our specification" is replaced by "this specification" (OK), But "our Ontology" (two occurrences in section 1)
>  
> Other comments from JP review
>  
> The abstract and introduction should mention the definition of the RDF ontology and the mapping table that will come with it.
>  
>  
> -- LC Comment -2389 : NO - partially implemented http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0086.html
>  
> -- LC Comment -2404 : NO - partially implemented http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0093.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0085.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0094.html
>  
>  
> -- LC Comment -2418: NO - partially implemented (Edits are missing) see edits at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0073.html
>  
> ____________
>  
> 2- Media API spec
>  
> -- LC Comment -2406 : NOT reviewed
>  
> -- LC Comment -2419 : NO partially implemented http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0090.html
>  
> -- LC Comment -2410 : OK But Chris must add Véronique's edits see edits at:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0107.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0106.html
>  
>  
>  
> [D] reminder : Metadata examples needed!
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0081.html
>  
> During the F2F in Lyon, we decided to verify our mapping ontology by having metadata in each format AOB
>  
>  
> Best Regards
> /Joakim
>  

_____________________________
Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier
Chair of Distributed Information Systems
University of Passau
Innstr. 43
94032 Passau

Room 248 ITZ

Tel.: +49 851 509 3063
Fax: +49 851 509 3062

stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de
https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/
http://twitter.com/fstegmai
_____________________________

Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2010 07:59:43 UTC