Re: [AGENDA] Media Annotations WG Teleconf - 2010-12-07

Dear all,

my regrets as well from my side.

I have a parallel meeting.

Best regards,

Tobias

2010/12/7 Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>

> Hi all,
>
> sorry, i cannot make it - i have to do urgent work for a project
> presentation.
>
> Regarding my open action items:
>
> #269 - please close it...we have talked about this quite a few times
> #360 - i will come up with a proposal after 16.12.
> #373 - also will do the review after 16.12.
>
> Sorry, but at the moment i am quiet busy with our presenation :(
>
> Best,
> Florian
>
> Am 05.12.2010 um 11:16 schrieb Joakim Söderberg:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> > Here is the agenda for next telecon. We will focus on the proposed
> updates to the abstract ontology.
> >
> > Please have a look at your (new and old) open actions. For example we are
> missing LC comment reviews from Daniel (a-334,343), Wonsuk (a-328) and
> Jean-Pierre (a-348).
> >
> > Regards
> > /Joakim
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------
> > 1. Convene
> > Media Annotations WG
> > Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 6294 ("MAWG") Alternative dial
> numbers:
> > France (Nice): +33.4.26.46.79.03
> > UK (Bristol) : +44.117.370.6152
> > IRC channel: #mediaann
> > Tuesday 2010-12-07 12:00-13:00 UTC, (ie, Amsterdam, Paris, Stockholm
> 13:00)
> > Regrets:
> > Chair: Joakim
> > Scribe: TBA
> >
> > Minutes to appear: http://www.w3.org/2010/12/07-mediaann-minutes.html
> > Propose to accept F2F minutes:
> http://www.w3.org/2010/11/30-mediaann-minutes.html
> >
> > 2. Next meeting
> > Tuesday 2010-12-14
> >
> > 3. Items
> > [A] Action items:
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open
> >
> > [B] Discuss the set of changes to the (abstract) Ontology, summarized
> here by Jean-Pierre:
> >
> > - It is proposed to add track as a sub-class of fragment to help aligning
> with MFWG
> > - It is proposed to add videoTrack and audioTrack to which currently
> existing specialised properties like frameRate or sampleRate will be more
> specifically linked as well as a better use of the compression property
> > - It is proposed to add captioningTrack to better align with MFWG and
> also to address subtitling more properly
> >
> > - It is proposed to change createDate (or creationDate) as "date" and
> list createDate (or creationDate) at the same level as releaseDate, etc.
>  This allows better hierarchical representation of dates in the RDF ontology
> as, for example, releaseDate cannot be considered as a subclass of
> createDate?
> >
> > - RatingValue should be float but it should now have been corrected in
> the API following today review of actions.
> >
> > - language and compression should allow string but also anyURI values,
> which would allow using SKOS concepts from classification schemes
> >
> > [C] Follow up on Implementation of LC comments
> >
> > 1- Media Ontology spec
> >
> > -- LC Comment -2405:  JP Evain:
> > Introduction
> > -          Note to implementers, content authors - not really explicit,
> maybe these roles should be mentioned saying things like "it is expected
> that implementers will do."  ". to the benefit of content providers", etc.
> >
> > -          There is no section 1.1 on the purpose of the specification
> (yet)
> >
> > Section 4.1 core property definitions -> now section 5.1
> > -          The ma: prefix still appears in the table but since the
> comment was made Pierre Antoine, while working on the mapping table
> suggested that the prefix should only be used with the ma-ont namespace in
> the RDF -> reconsider position?
> >
> > Section 4.2.2 - no change as explained in previous response - tables in
> line -> now 5.2.2
> >
> > Joakim: "our specification" is replaced by "this specification" (OK), But
> "our Ontology" (two occurrences in section 1)
> >
> > Other comments from JP review
> >
> > The abstract and introduction should mention the definition of the RDF
> ontology and the mapping table that will come with it.
> >
> >
> > -- LC Comment -2389 : NO - partially implemented
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0086.html
> >
> > -- LC Comment -2404 : NO - partially implemented
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0093.html
> >
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0085.html
> >
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0094.html
> >
> >
> > -- LC Comment -2418: NO - partially implemented (Edits are missing) see
> edits at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0073.html
> >
> > ____________
> >
> > 2- Media API spec
> >
> > -- LC Comment -2406 : NOT reviewed
> >
> > -- LC Comment -2419 : NO partially implemented
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0090.html
> >
> > -- LC Comment -2410 : OK But Chris must add Véronique's edits see edits
> at:
> >
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0107.html
> >
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0106.html
> >
> >
> >
> > [D] reminder : Metadata examples needed!
> >
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0081.html
> >
> > During the F2F in Lyon, we decided to verify our mapping ontology by
> having metadata in each format AOB
> >
> >
> > Best Regards
> > /Joakim
> >
>
> _____________________________
> Dipl. Inf. Florian Stegmaier
> Chair of Distributed Information Systems
> University of Passau
> Innstr. 43
> 94032 Passau
>
> Room 248 ITZ
>
> Tel.: +49 851 509 3063
> Fax: +49 851 509 3062
>
> stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de
> https://www.dimis.fim.uni-passau.de/iris/
> http://twitter.com/fstegmai
> _____________________________
>
>
>


-- 
___________________________________
Dr. Tobias Bürger
http://www.tobiasbuerger.com