RE: [AGENDA] Media Annotations WG Teleconf - 2010-12-07

Dear all,

Regret for today’s call. because of business trip.

These days, I am a little bit busy for finalizing the project.

 

Concerning my action items, I have done ACTION-372.

And I will do other AIs, ACTION-309, ACTION-328, ACTION-337, ACTION-351 and 356. until Thursday

According to the ACTION-351 and 356, could someone give me a hint? Already gone a little bit long time. sorry ;)

 

Best regards,

Wonsuk.

 

 

From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Joakim Soderberg
Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2010 7:16 PM
To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: [AGENDA] Media Annotations WG Teleconf - 2010-12-07

 

Hello everyone,

Here is the agenda for next telecon. We will focus on the proposed updates to the abstract ontology.

 

Please have a look at your (new and old) open actions. For example we are missing LC comment reviews from Daniel (a-334,343), Wonsuk (a-328) and Jean-Pierre (a-348).

 

Regards

/Joakim

 

 

-------------------------------

1. Convene

Media Annotations WG

Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 6294 ("MAWG") Alternative dial numbers:

France (Nice): +33.4.26.46.79.03

UK (Bristol) : +44.117.370.6152

IRC channel: #mediaann

Tuesday 2010-12-07 12:00-13:00 UTC, (ie, Amsterdam, Paris, Stockholm 13:00)

Regrets:

Chair: Joakim

Scribe: TBA

 

Minutes to appear: http://www.w3.org/2010/12/07-mediaann-minutes.html


Propose to accept F2F minutes: http://www.w3.org/2010/11/30-mediaann-minutes.html


 

2. Next meeting

Tuesday 2010-12-14

 

3. Items

[A] Action items:

http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open <http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open> 

 

[B] Discuss the set of changes to the (abstract) Ontology, summarized here by Jean-Pierre:

 

- It is proposed to add track as a sub-class of fragment to help aligning with MFWG

- It is proposed to add videoTrack and audioTrack to which currently existing specialised properties like frameRate or sampleRate will be more specifically linked as well as a better use of the compression property

- It is proposed to add captioningTrack to better align with MFWG and also to address subtitling more properly

 

- It is proposed to change createDate (or creationDate) as "date" and list createDate (or creationDate) at the same level as releaseDate, etc.  This allows better hierarchical representation of dates in the RDF ontology as, for example, releaseDate cannot be considered as a subclass of createDate?

 

- RatingValue should be float but it should now have been corrected in the API following today review of actions.

 

- language and compression should allow string but also anyURI values, which would allow using SKOS concepts from classification schemes

 

[C] Follow up on Implementation of LC comments

 

1- Media Ontology spec

 

-- LC Comment -2405:  JP Evain:

Introduction

-          Note to implementers, content authors - not really explicit, maybe these roles should be mentioned saying things like "it is expected that implementers will do."  ". to the benefit of content providers", etc.

 

-          There is no section 1.1 on the purpose of the specification (yet)

 

Section 4.1 core property definitions -> now section 5.1

-          The ma: prefix still appears in the table but since the comment was made Pierre Antoine, while working on the mapping table suggested that the prefix should only be used with the ma-ont namespace in the RDF -> reconsider position?

 

Section 4.2.2 - no change as explained in previous response - tables in line -> now 5.2.2

 

Joakim: "our specification" is replaced by "this specification" (OK), But "our Ontology" (two occurrences in section 1)

 

Other comments from JP review

 

The abstract and introduction should mention the definition of the RDF ontology and the mapping table that will come with it.

 

 

-- LC Comment -2389 : NO - partially implemented http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0086.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0086.html> 

 

-- LC Comment -2404 : NO - partially implemented http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0093.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0093.html> 

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0085.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0085.html> 

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0094.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0094.html> 

 

 

-- LC Comment -2418: NO - partially implemented (Edits are missing) see edits at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0073.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0073.html> 

 

____________

 

2- Media API spec

 

-- LC Comment -2406 : NOT reviewed

 

-- LC Comment -2419 : NO partially implemented http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0090.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0090.html> 

 

-- LC Comment -2410 : OK But Chris must add Véronique's edits see edits at:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0107.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0107.html> 

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0106.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0106.html> 

 

 

 

[D] reminder : Metadata examples needed!

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0081.html <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0081.html> 

 

During the F2F in Lyon, we decided to verify our mapping ontology by having metadata in each format AOB

 

 

Best Regards

/Joakim