public-iri@w3.org from November 2011 by author

Adil Allawi

• Re: Bidi IRI with a Bidi TLD (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: Bidi IRI with a Bidi TLD (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: Bidi IRI with a Bidi TLD (Monday, 7 November)
• Bidi IRI with a Bidi TLD (Saturday, 5 November)
• Re: IETF 82 Agenda and call for presenters (Wednesday, 2 November)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Agreement on IRI "processing spec" moving to W3C (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: URL parsing in HTML5 (Friday, 4 November)
• Re: URL parsing in HTML5 (Friday, 4 November)
• Re: URL parsing in HTML5 (Friday, 4 November)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: Agreement on IRI "processing spec" moving to W3C (Thursday, 24 November)

Chris Weber

• Re: Agreement on IRI "processing spec" moving to W3C (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: Agreement on IRI "processing spec" moving to W3C (Thursday, 24 November)
• Agreement on IRI "processing spec" moving to W3C (Sunday, 20 November)
• Re: [iri] #44: Reference Unicode TR 46, and if yes, how? (Friday, 11 November)
• Re: IETF 82 Agenda and call for presenters (Saturday, 5 November)
• Re: IETF 82 Agenda and call for presenters (Wednesday, 2 November)
• IETF 82 Agenda and call for presenters (Wednesday, 2 November)

iri issue tracker

• Re: [iri] #85: Align terminology in 3987bis with RFC 6365 (was: Align terminology in 3987bis with 3536bis) (Thursday, 17 November)
• [iri] #107: Clarify requirement for security considerations (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: [iri] #106: Restore text about reverse domain name use for private URI/IRI schemes (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: [iri] #73: Decide on organization-specific schemes (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: [iri] #24: sort out issues between IRIs and HTML form upload (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: [iri] #2: Need better definition of "absolute URL" as used in HTML5 (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: [iri] #1: need better definition of "valid URL" as used in HTML5 (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: [iri] #1: need better definition of "valid URL" as used in HTML5 (Tuesday, 15 November)
• [iri] #106: Restore text about reverse domain name use for private URI/IRI schemes (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: [iri] #6: Allow "best practices for BIDI IRIs" to be separate document (Monday, 14 November)

John C Klensin

• Re: Agreement on IRI "processing spec" moving to W3C (Sunday, 20 November)
• Re: [iri] #44: Reference Unicode TR 46, and if yes, how? (Wednesday, 9 November)

Julian Reschke

• Re: -08 nits: W3C references (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: URL parsing in HTML5 (Friday, 4 November)
• Re: URL parsing in HTML5 (Friday, 4 November)
• Re: URL parsing in HTML5 (Friday, 4 November)

Larry Masinter

• RE: Agreement on IRI "processing spec" moving to W3C (Tuesday, 29 November)
• RE: [iri] #5: Separate IRI from "presentation of IRI" as concepts (Monday, 28 November)
• RE: 4395 bis comments (Thursday, 17 November)
• RE: [iri] #44: Reference Unicode TR 46, and if yes, how? (Saturday, 12 November)
• Fw: blog post: How many ways can you slice a URL and name the pieces? (Saturday, 5 November)

Marc Blanchet

• iri meeting minutes (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: IETF 82 Agenda and call for presenters (Wednesday, 2 November)

Mark Davis ☕

• Re: [iri] #44: Reference Unicode TR 46, and if yes, how? (Friday, 11 November)

Martin J. Dürst

• Re: Agreement on IRI "processing spec" moving to W3C (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: Agreement on IRI "processing spec" moving to W3C (Thursday, 24 November)
• Re: Agreement on IRI "processing spec" moving to W3C (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: Agreement on IRI "processing spec" moving to W3C (Monday, 21 November)
• Re: Agreement on IRI "processing spec" moving to W3C (Sunday, 20 November)
• Re: [iri] #2: Need better definition of "absolute URL" as used in HTML5 (and #1) (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: [iri] #5: Separate IRI from "presentation of IRI" as concepts (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: key IRI issues (Monday, 14 November)
• Re: -08 nits: W3C references (Tuesday, 8 November)
• Re: -08 nits: W3C references (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: Bidi IRI with a Bidi TLD (Monday, 7 November)
• Re: Bidi IRI with a Bidi TLD (Sunday, 6 November)
• RE: URL parsing in HTML5 (Saturday, 5 November)
• Re: URL parsing in HTML5 (Saturday, 5 November)
• Re: IETF 82 Agenda and call for presenters (Wednesday, 2 November)
• Re: IETF 82 Agenda and call for presenters (Friday, 4 November)
• Re: URL parsing in HTML5 (Friday, 4 November)
• Re: IETF 82 Agenda and call for presenters (Wednesday, 2 November)

Matitiahu Allouche

• Re: Bidi IRI with a Bidi TLD (Sunday, 6 November)

Meetecho IETF support

• IRI session recording available (Monday, 21 November)
• Meetecho support for IRI WG meeting session (Wednesday, 16 November)

Michael[tm] Smith

• Re: URL parsing in HTML5 (Friday, 4 November)

Peter Saint-Andre

• Re: 4395 bis comments (Thursday, 17 November)
• Re: [iri] #5: Separate IRI from "presentation of IRI" as concepts (Wednesday, 16 November)
• Re: [iri] #106: Restore text about reverse domain name use for private URI/IRI schemes (Tuesday, 15 November)
• Re: [iri] #2: Need better definition of "absolute URL" as used in HTML5 (and #1) (Tuesday, 15 November)
• key IRI issues (Saturday, 12 November)
• [iri] #85: Align terminology in 3987bis with 3536bis (Saturday, 12 November)
• [iri] #92: Sections 3.4 & 3.5 should be moved into Section 3.6 of 3987bis (Saturday, 12 November)
• [iri] #24: sort out issues between IRIs and HTML form upload (Friday, 11 November)
• [iri] #2: Need better definition of "absolute URL" as used in HTML5 (Friday, 11 November)
• [iri] #1: need better definition of "valid URL" as used in HTML5 (Friday, 11 November)
• [iri] #5: Separate IRI from "presentation of IRI" as concepts (Friday, 11 November)
• [iri] #6: Allow "best practices for BIDI IRIs" to be separate document (Friday, 11 November)
• Re: [iri] #44: Reference Unicode TR 46, and if yes, how? (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: IETF 82 Agenda and call for presenters (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: Bidi IRI with a Bidi TLD (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: [iri] #44: Reference Unicode TR 46, and if yes, how? (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: [iri] #104: Characters are still excluded from URIs (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: [iri] #47: Practical length limits on IRIs or components thereoff (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: [iri] #27: do we need to say anything special about ZWNJ and ZWJ? (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: [iri] #99: New schemes should make sure query part uses UTF-8 (Wednesday, 9 November)
• Re: URL parsing in HTML5 (Friday, 4 November)
• URL parsing in HTML5 (Friday, 4 November)

Phillips, Addison

• RE: Agreement on IRI "processing spec" moving to W3C (Sunday, 20 November)
• RE: [iri] #5: Separate IRI from "presentation of IRI" as concepts (Monday, 14 November)

Last message date: Tuesday, 29 November 2011 18:59:40 UTC