Re: -08 nits: W3C references

On 2011/11/08 16:48, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-11-07 11:30, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
>> Hello Julian,
>>
>> On 2011/10/22 16:16, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just noticed that the XML sources uses a non-optimal way to identify
>>> W3C documents, causing automated checkers not to understand them.
>>
>> What is it that makes or breaks this? The data that you have below has
>
> <seriesInfo/>.

Fixed.

>> problems with the order of authors, so I have to do a manual merge.
>
> Blame the W3C for not publishing the data in a format where the author
> ordering is stable :-)

I told them maybe 10 years ago already! Somebody wanted to show off RDF, 
but forgot that you have to tell RDF explicitly when something should 
stay ordered.

Regards,   Martin.

Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2011 09:09:40 UTC