- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:48:03 -0700
- To: Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net>
- CC: public-iri@w3.org
On 10/24/11 12:03 AM, Chris Weber wrote: > On 10/21/2011 3:17 PM, iri issue tracker wrote: >> I remember we had a long discussion about this, but don't remember any >> recommendation to do anything about imposing a limit. >> >> Perhaps something of the form "This document does not specify any limits >> on length of IRIs or any components of them. Generators of IRIs should be >> aware of the potential length limits downstream processors might have for >> IRIs, parsed IRI components, and the results of translation to parsed URI >> components or reconstructed URIs. > That's my understanding too - it would be totally arbitrary to place a > length limit on IRIs or components. You could include an example with > your statement, something like - e.g. some Web browsers and Web servers > have length limitations, which even differ between them. <hat type='individual'/> Yes, I think some informational text along those lines might be helpful. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 21:48:32 UTC