- From: Chris Weber <chris@lookout.net>
- Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 14:11:37 -0700
- To: public-iri@w3.org
Hello Martin, On 11/1/2011 6:06 PM, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote: > I think we should also have some time for the bidi draft. > > Adil and I had some discussion about two weeks back, and Adil came up > with some good ideas. Would Adil like to present on those ideas? I've posted the draft to http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/82/agenda/iri.txt and broke up the time to include the BIDI and IRI Comparison drafts. This agenda could still change based on further feedback. > As for "IRI Processing Spec", I think it would be good to come up soon > with a name that sticks. "IRI Processing Spec" is too generic, because > 3987bis also contains stuff about processing IRIs. Maybe "IRI > Preprocessing" would work better? > That can be part of the discussion, but my understanding is that this spec would not be limited to pre-processing only. Best regards, Chris Weber
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2011 21:11:35 UTC