- From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 06:06:26 +0800
- To: duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
- CC: public-iri@w3.org
On 11/15/11 4:18 PM, iri issue tracker wrote: > #106: Restore text about reverse domain name use for private URI/IRI schemes > > 4395bis removed the following text from RFC 4395: > > Organizations that desire a private name space for URI scheme names > are encouraged to use a prefix based on their domain name, expressed > in reverse order. For example, a URI scheme name of com-example-info > might be registered by the vendor that owns the example.com domain > name. > > The reason is that there were no actual usages. But now, there is a use > (see http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/com-eventbrite- > attendee), as reported at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri- > review/current/msg01548.html. > > I guess we should restore this text. No objections here. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 22:07:01 UTC