Hi all, I do like Steve's proposal using an existing element in h1 to create some sort of a hierarchy. But I must admit that the first thing that came to mind when reading Steve's proposal for <strong>, I wondered why the proposal wasn't for <small>. So depending on whether you want the smaller heading above or below the larger one, we could do either of the following: <h1> <small>Breaking News</small> Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea! </h1> <h1> Breaking News <small>Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea!</small> </h1> /Denis On 2013-05-07, at 9:38 AM, Wilfred Nas <wilfrednas@gmail.com> wrote: > Why not small for the subtitle part? > > <h1>title > <small>subtitle</small> > </h1> > > Cheers > > Wilfred Nas > > On 7 mei 2013, at 15:26, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > >> disclaimer: its an off the cuff idea only! >> >> I have been musing on the idea of using strong to signify the title part of a heading that has title and subtitle: >> >> <h1><strong>title</strong> subtitle</h1> >> >> would be interested to get others thoughts on the pattern >> >> >> -- >> >> Regards >> >> SteveF >> HTML 5.1
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 13:52:37 UTC