- From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 16:08:14 +0100
- To: "'Ian Devlin'" <ian@iandevlin.com>, "'Denis Boudreau'" <dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com>
- Cc: "'Wilfred Nas'" <wilfrednas@gmail.com>, "'Steve Faulkner'" <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "'HTMLWG WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <035a01ce4b34$b2b56ce0$182046a0$@tink.co.uk>
Ian Devlin wrote: “I don't like the use of <small> as its current definition is to represent "side comments" which a subtitle would not be (it's more important than that). I know that we can of course change the meaning of the element in the specification, but as Mallory says for <strong>, this would mean changing the meaning of this element again.” I agree that re-purposing existing elements is often fraught. I still wonder whether a purpose built element might be the answer? One possibility might be the subline element. A *very early draft of how such an element might look can be found here: http://www.html5accessibility.com/HTML5extensions/subline.html Thoughts? Léonie. From: Ian Devlin [mailto:ian@iandevlin.com] Sent: 07 May 2013 15:00 To: Denis Boudreau Cc: Wilfred Nas; Steve Faulkner; HTMLWG WG Subject: Re: using strong to indicate a title? I would prefer using attributes to specifically add the relation you want rather than it being implied. I don't like the use of <small> as its current definition is to represent "side comments" which a subtitle would not be (it's more important than that). I know that we can of course change the meaning of the element in the specification, but as Mallory says for <strong>, this would mean changing the meaning of this element again. On 7 May 2013 15:52, Denis Boudreau <dboudreau@accessibiliteweb.com> wrote: Hi all, I do like Steve's proposal using an existing element in h1 to create some sort of a hierarchy. But I must admit that the first thing that came to mind when reading Steve's proposal for <strong>, I wondered why the proposal wasn't for <small>. So depending on whether you want the smaller heading above or below the larger one, we could do either of the following: <h1> <small>Breaking News</small> Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea! </h1> <h1> Breaking News <small>Steve Faulkner had this crazy idea!</small> </h1> /Denis On 2013-05-07, at 9:38 AM, Wilfred Nas <wilfrednas@gmail.com> wrote: Why not small for the subtitle part? <h1>title <small>subtitle</small> </h1> Cheers Wilfred Nas On 7 mei 2013, at 15:26, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: disclaimer: its an off the cuff idea only! I have been musing on the idea of using strong to signify the title part of a heading that has title and subtitle: <h1><strong>title</strong> subtitle</h1> would be interested to get others thoughts on the pattern -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
Received on Tuesday, 7 May 2013 15:08:49 UTC