- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:38:29 +0200
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
On 2011-06-23 19:31, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:24:01 +0200, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> > wrote: >> I stand, loudly applaud and cheer Julian, then sit back down and shut up. >> He's said it - how does the WG plan to respond to this very real and >> honest statement? Are we in Last Call (first, second or 15th?), and does >> not that mean that the specification is "frozen" for wider review? > > It's quite normal for editor's drafts of Last Call documents to change > in response to feedback. E.g. something very similar happened to the > Progress Events specification the WebApps WG is developing. Yes. At some point we need to draw a line between bug fixing, editorial improvements, and new features. This is a new feature. New features, as far as I can tell, require a new LC. So can we please be frank about the fact that *this* LC really is a request for wider review, and that there really is no doubt that there will be another LC? Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 17:39:08 UTC