- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:15:23 -0400
- To: public-html@w3.org
On 6/23/11 1:38 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > So can we please be frank about the fact that *this* LC really is a > request for wider review, and that there really is no doubt that there > will be another LC? A new LC is required if any substantive change needs to be made to the spec in response to LC feedback, no? Not just a new feature; any significant change. Given that, how could there possibly be doubt that there will be another LC, unless we expect people to not actually read the spec during this LC? (Note that this is actually not and unreasonable expectation, given the spec's size and the difficulty of actually understanding how the parts fit together.) -Boris
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 18:15:51 UTC