W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2011

Re: REVERT REQUEST for "crossorigin" attribute

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:31:25 +0200
To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, public-html@w3.org, "John Foliot" <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <op.vxjhmna464w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:24:01 +0200, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>  
> I stand, loudly applaud and cheer Julian, then sit back down and shut up.
> He's said it - how does the WG plan to respond to this very real and
> honest statement? Are we in Last Call (first, second or 15th?), and does
> not that mean that the specification is "frozen" for wider review?

It's quite normal for editor's drafts of Last Call documents to change in  
response to feedback. E.g. something very similar happened to the Progress  
Events specification the WebApps WG is developing.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 17:32:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:14 UTC