- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:35:16 +0200
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
On 2011-06-23 19:24, John Foliot wrote: > Julian Reschke wrote: >> >> Unless I'm mistaken, a Last Call decision brings with it additional >> responsibilities for both the group, and the editor. > > <snip> > >> That way folks >> like me, who are faced with continuing chaos as we do the W3C the >> courtesy of >> giving our attention to the specification the organization has asked us >> to review, at least know to wait until the editor has stopped tossing >> things into the document. > > I stand, loudly applaud and cheer Julian, then sit back down and shut up. > He's said it - how does the WG plan to respond to this very real and > honest statement? Are we in Last Call (first, second or 15th?), and does > not that mean that the specification is "frozen" for wider review? Clarifying: I was just citing Shelley (she asked for the revert in Bugzilla, but apparently that is not sufficient). Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 17:35:57 UTC