W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > June 2011

Re: REVERT REQUEST for "crossorigin" attribute

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:35:16 +0200
Message-ID: <4E037954.4060102@gmx.de>
To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
CC: public-html@w3.org
On 2011-06-23 19:24, John Foliot wrote:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Unless I'm mistaken, a Last Call decision brings with it additional
>> responsibilities for both the group, and the editor.
> <snip>
>> That way folks
>> like me, who are faced with continuing chaos as we do the W3C the
>> courtesy of
>> giving our attention to the specification the organization has asked us
>> to review, at least know to wait until the editor has stopped tossing
>> things into the document.
> I stand, loudly applaud and cheer Julian, then sit back down and shut up.
> He's said it - how does the WG plan to respond to this very real and
> honest statement? Are we in Last Call (first, second or 15th?), and does
> not that mean that the specification is "frozen" for wider review?

Clarifying: I was just citing Shelley (she asked for the revert in 
Bugzilla, but apparently that is not sufficient).

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 17:35:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:14 UTC