SV: Re: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: RE: UNS: Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: UNS: Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- RE: UNS: Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- AW: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present
- Re: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- RE: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- Re: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- Re: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- RE: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- Re: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- Re: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- Re: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- Re: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- Re: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- RE: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- RE: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- RE: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- RE: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- Re: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- Re: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
- RE: Clarification of WCAG intent and meaning of techniques [Re: WCAG considering amending F65 to NOT fail missing ALT text if title or aria-label is present]
[Bug 19277] Relationship and precedence of hidden="" and display:none should be clarified/defined
re: Bug 19277 - Relationship and precedence of hidden="" and display:none should be clarified/defined
HTML-A11Y Task Force Agenda; 21 November at 16:00Z for 60 minutes
Minutes: HTML A11y Bug triage telecon, 20th November 2013
Agenda: HTML A11y Bug triage telecon, 20th November 2013
Bug triage - New bugs report
[Bug 19277] Relationship and precedence of hidden="" and display:none should be clarified/defined
[Bug 18574] @hidden should have a weak mapping to aria-hidden=true
[Bug 18574] @hidden should have a weak mapping to aria-hidden=true
Next Steps re HTML Bug 23380
[Bug 18574] @hidden should have a weak mapping to aria-hidden=true
[Bug 18574] @hidden should have a weak mapping to aria-hidden=true
[Bug 19277] Relationship and precedence of hidden="" and display:none should be clarified/defined
[Bug 18574] @hidden should have a weak mapping to aria-hidden=true
[Bug 23378] ARIA: Strong Native Semantics table should defined implicit non-required state on form elements (Currently defines required state, but not the implicit inverse)
[Bug 23378] ARIA: Strong Native Semantics table should defined implicit non-required state on form elements (Currently defines required state, but not the implicit inverse)
A11Y-related CR bug discussion at HTML WG F2F
- Re: A11Y-related CR bug discussion at HTML WG F2F
- Re: A11Y-related CR bug discussion at HTML WG F2F
- Next Steps re two ARIA related HTML 5 Bugs
Fwd: Canvas Focus Ring Tests/Demos
Cancelled: HTML A11y Bug triage telecon, 6th November 2013
Bug triage - New bugs report
November: teleconf dates...
Call for Consensus: Canvas 2d spec
- Re: Call for Consensus: Canvas 2d spec
- Re: Call for Consensus: Canvas 2d spec
- RE: Call for Consensus: Canvas 2d spec