public-device-apis-log@w3.org from February 2021 by date

Friday, 26 February 2021

• Re: [battery] Assess compatibility risk of using [SecureContext] (#15) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Closed: [battery] Update the reference to Feature Policy (#26) Mounir Lamouri via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Assess compatibility risk of using [SecureContext] (#15) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Assess compatibility risk of using [SecureContext] (#15) Domenic Denicola via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Assess compatibility risk of using [SecureContext] (#15) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Thursday, 25 February 2021

• Re: [battery] Assess compatibility risk of using [SecureContext] (#15) Domenic Denicola via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Assess compatibility risk of using [SecureContext] (#15) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Assess compatibility risk of using [SecureContext] (#15) Domenic Denicola via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Assess compatibility risk of using [SecureContext] (#15) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [battery] Assess compatibility risk of using [SecureContext] (#15) Domenic Denicola via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Clean up task queuing and document management (#307) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Clean up task queuing and document management (#307) Domenic Denicola via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Clean up task queuing and document management (#307) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Tidy up uses of "in parallel". (#299) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Wednesday, 24 February 2021

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Clean up task queuing and document management (#307) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Clean up task queuing and document management (#307) Domenic Denicola via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Clean up task queuing and document management (#307) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Improve references to terms from the Page Visibility spec. (#306) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Improve references to terms from the Page Visibility spec. (#306) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Improve references to terms from the Page Visibility spec. (#306) Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [dap-charter] Contact Picker API (#97) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
• Re: [dap-charter] Contact Picker API (#97) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Improve references to terms from the Page Visibility spec. (#306) Reilly Grant via GitHub

Tuesday, 23 February 2021

• Closed: [accelerometer] Explain how the implementation separates gravity from linear acceleration (#58) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [accelerometer] Note gravity and linear accelerometer relationship (#59) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Monday, 22 February 2021

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Improve references to terms from the Page Visibility spec. (#306) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Wednesday, 17 February 2021

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Remove the "obtain a permission" algorithm. (#298) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub

Tuesday, 16 February 2021

• Re: [proximity] https://w3c.github.io/proximity/ not updated (#45) Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
• Re: [proximity] https://w3c.github.io/proximity/ not updated (#45) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Closed: [proximity] https://w3c.github.io/proximity/ not updated (#45) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [proximity] Regenerate HTML snapshot to trigger rebuild (#46) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub

Monday, 15 February 2021

• [proximity] https://w3c.github.io/proximity/ not updated (#45) Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Tidy up uses of "in parallel". (#299) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Improve references to terms from the Page Visibility spec. (#306) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Thursday, 11 February 2021

• Re: [orientation-sensor] fix: img width/height percentages to style (#69) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [orientation-sensor] fix: img width/height percentages to style (#69) W3C Bot via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Tidy up uses of "in parallel". (#299) Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Tidy up uses of "in parallel". (#299) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Tidy up uses of "in parallel". (#299) Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Tidy up uses of "in parallel". (#299) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Closed: [screen-wake-lock] obtain permission seems wrong (#187) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Wednesday, 10 February 2021

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Simplify the "obtain permission" algorithm. (#303) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Simplify the "obtain permission" algorithm. (#303) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub

Tuesday, 9 February 2021

• Re: [accelerometer] Explain how the implementation separates gravity from linear acceleration (#58) Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub
• Re: [accelerometer] Explain how the implementation separates gravity from linear acceleration (#58) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• Re: [accelerometer] Explain how the implementation separates gravity from linear acceleration (#58) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• [accelerometer] Explain how the implementation separates gravity from linear acceleration (#58) Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub

Monday, 8 February 2021

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Tidy up uses of "in parallel". (#299) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Saturday, 6 February 2021

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Tidy up uses of "in parallel". (#299) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Friday, 5 February 2021

• Re: [proximity] Behavior of `distance` attribute when sensor cannot provide distance measurements? (#44) Andy Carle via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Tidy up uses of "in parallel". (#299) Reilly Grant via GitHub
• [screen-wake-lock] Auto-releasing wake lock depending on the user presence (#300) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Tidy up uses of "in parallel". (#299) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [proximity] Behavior of `distance` attribute when sensor cannot provide distance measurements? (#44) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Formally define a permission revocation algorithm. (#297) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Thursday, 4 February 2021

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Formally define a permission revocation algorithm. (#297) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] editorial: Formally define a permission revocation algorithm. (#297) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] Adjust state record selection in "Managing Wake Locks". (#295) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Tuesday, 2 February 2021

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] "Release a wake lock": should we queue a task to fire the "release" event? (#293) Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] "Release a wake lock": should we queue a task to fire the "release" event? (#293) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] "Release a wake lock": should we queue a task to fire the "release" event? (#293) Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] "Release a wake lock": should we queue a task to fire the "release" event? (#293) Domenic Denicola via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] "Release a wake lock": should we queue a task to fire the "release" event? (#293) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Monday, 1 February 2021

• Re: [screen-wake-lock] "Release a wake lock": should we queue a task to fire the "release" event? (#293) Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] "Release a wake lock": should we queue a task to fire the "release" event? (#293) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] "Release a wake lock": should we queue a task to fire the "release" event? (#293) Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] "Release a wake lock": should we queue a task to fire the "release" event? (#293) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] "Release a wake lock": should we queue a task to fire the "release" event? (#293) Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] "Release a wake lock": should we queue a task to fire the "release" event? (#293) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] "Release a wake lock": should we queue a task to fire the "release" event? (#293) Anne van Kesteren via GitHub
• Re: [screen-wake-lock] "Release a wake lock": should we queue a task to fire the "release" event? (#293) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
• [screen-wake-lock] "Release a wake lock": should we queue a task to fire the "release" event? (#293) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub

Last message date: Friday, 26 February 2021 19:50:40 UTC