W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-testsuite@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Zero passing or One passing browser tests

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:54:27 -0800
To: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-css-testsuite@w3.org" <public-css-testsuite@w3.org>, w3c-css-wg <w3c-css-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20101118225427.GA18681@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Thursday 2010-11-18 22:20 +0000, Arron Eicholz wrote:
> http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/results<http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/results#css21-test-suite-results>
> I have completed the Zero browser passing and One browser passing page for the RC3 test suite.
> The information is from my results running the cases and does not contain the data from the test suite harness since the results are incomplete right now for RC3.
> Here is the link to the issues page too if you think any of the cases from the zero/one passing page are invalid or need editing.
> http://wiki.csswg.org/test/css2.1/issues

A bunch of these tests have errors reported.  The errors I reported
on tests in this list are:

zero passes list:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-testsuite/2010Oct/0118.html (partial; probably doesn't help get passes)

one passes list (I think I'm excluding the ones Mozilla passes
correctly, though I'm not sure):

Also, font-weight-bolder-001 and lighter-001 should be passed by
current Firefox nightlies (and Firefox 4.0b8, when it's released).
(And I thought Firefox should pass font-weight-normal-001 on Mac and
(in 4.0 betas) Windows, though I haven't checked.)

(And how in the world did you get any passes on
text-transform-bicameral-008?  It should be impossible to pass.  See
the last of the above URLs.)


L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2010 22:55:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:26:52 UTC