public-awwsw@w3.org from March 2011 by subject

[Fwd: +blank node identifiers was- Re: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"]

[Fwd: [Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"]

[Fwd: Nodes and Arcs]

[Fwd: Resource Token Exchange]

[Graphs] Fwd: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"

a different way to interpret URIs that confuse IRs with their subjects

Agents

AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-03-15

AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-03-29

Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"

Diagram of it all

Draft minutes from 29-Mar-2011 teleconference

draft plan for moving forward on 200/303

Extra AWWSW Telecon Tuesday 2011-03-22

getting the nose-following document out the door

Graphs / IRs / Blank Nodes - related strand

Harvesting from Roy's paper

hold up

Identifying photocopy machine poses problem for Cuyahoga County official

Latest views

meeting

mini issue-57 doc feedback

mini issue-57 doc feedback - p2

Minutes from today's call

new AWWSW home page

new dated version of "how to refer"

out of band

please review issue-57 document draft before Tuesday telcon

proposed change to a spec

Requirements for Any Theory of "Information Resource"

Resource identity of GETable URIs [Was Re: the mistake I made! ]

Roy's definition of a REST resource as a "Curried" form of ftrr:IR

Sandro's 2002 article "Disambiguating RDF Identifiers"

summary so far.

the mistake I made! - was Re: proposed change to a spec

The resource identity guessing game vs. bounded ambiguity [was Re: Comments on "SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs"]

Universally constraining interpretations [was Re: summary so far.]

URI Meaning & Fixed resources summary

Using the term "representation" bidirectionally [was Re: the mistake I made! ]

where to go with the 'requirements' note

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2011 13:44:33 UTC