- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 21:22:28 +0000
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- CC: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
the attachment is exactly the views :) other's don't quite get the four things distinction, but certainly I do and have said the same :) [ box - an abstract box which can contain statements, and whose contents can vary over time box-realization - a realization of a box, some process coupled to some memory which can manage realizations of the box's state/contents and change the state from one to another, change the contents of the box. snapshot - an abstract snapshot of the state/contents of a box at time t, a mathematical set of statements, a g-snap snapshot-realization - a realization of a snapshot, a distinct immutable collection of triples in memory, or some lexical representation of them, a g-text ] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Feb/0120.html relating to your graph, in the same order: G-Box = box G-IR = box-realization G-Snap = snapshot G-Text = snapshot-realization the group is using a single term "g-box" to refer to both G-IR and G-BOX in your diagram, amounts to the same though in practise for those wanting to go deep enough. Jonathan Rees wrote: > See attachment > > Seems a bit unfortunate that they're taking the upper right route, > while we're taking the lower left, but so it goes. > > If they're claiming the G-SNAP is an IR... well it's not clearly in > agreement with TimBL. I'm not sure I care as there is no way to tell > the difference, as far as I can tell - the two boxes are isomorphic, > and the diagram commutes. > > Jonathan > > On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: >> FYI, a conversation Pat and I have been having on the RDF WG >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Mar/0114.html >> >> there's a lot more context, but that's about the top and bottom of it, named >> graph (named g-box) that changes over time ("IR" then), blank node >> identifiers scoped to the name where one exists, and where not then just to >> the serialized rdf as per usual. >> >> Nathan >>
Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 21:23:42 UTC