W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-awwsw@w3.org > March 2011

Re: Graphs / IRs / Blank Nodes - related strand

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:05:15 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTimg=Euk3_3Mr1x5CrZXGNHmM8Y7JuDKpOzNXzzs@mail.gmail.com>
To: nathan@webr3.org
Cc: AWWSW TF <public-awwsw@w3.org>
See attachment

Seems a bit unfortunate that they're taking the upper right route,
while we're taking the lower left, but so it goes.

If they're claiming the G-SNAP is an IR... well it's not clearly in
agreement with TimBL.  I'm not sure I care as there is no way to tell
the difference, as far as I can tell - the two boxes are isomorphic,
and the diagram commutes.


On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
> FYI, a conversation Pat and I have been having on the RDF WG
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Mar/0114.html
> there's a lot more context, but that's about the top and bottom of it, named
> graph (named g-box) that changes over time ("IR" then), blank node
> identifiers scoped to the name where one exists, and where not then just to
> the serialized rdf as per usual.
> Nathan

Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 21:05:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:07:22 UTC